Re: [zfs-discuss] raidz and compression, difficulties

2008-01-27 Thread Joachim Pihl
On Sat, 26 Jan 2008 23:33:16 +0100, Toby Thain [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 26-Jan-08, at 2:24 AM, Joachim Pihl wrote: So far so good, zfs get all reports compression to be active. Now for the problem: After adding another 300GB of uncompressed .tif and .bin/.cue (audio CD) files, I

Re: [zfs-discuss] raidz and compression, difficulties

2008-01-27 Thread MC
I didn't expect miracles, but since WinRAR gave 13% compression ZFS doesn't compress a block if it can't get a certain amount of return on it. Since the default compression is less effective than RAR, you can bet ZFS is seeing much less than 13% return. I expect everything is working

Re: [zfs-discuss] raidz and compression, difficulties

2008-01-27 Thread Tim
Why not create a sample dataset and throw some large .txt files out there and see what happens? That way you'll know for certain if there's some bug you're hitting, or if it's just not applicable to your current dataset. On 1/27/08, Joachim Pihl [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Sat, 26 Jan 2008

Re: [zfs-discuss] raidz and compression, difficulties

2008-01-27 Thread Joachim Pihl
On Sun, 27 Jan 2008 19:11:33 +0100, MC [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I didn't expect miracles, but since WinRAR gave 13% compression ZFS doesn't compress a block if it can't get a certain amount of return on it. Since the default compression is less effective than RAR, you can bet ZFS is

Re: [zfs-discuss] raidz and compression, difficulties

2008-01-27 Thread Darren J Moffat
Joachim Pihl wrote: On Sun, 27 Jan 2008 19:11:33 +0100, MC [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I didn't expect miracles, but since WinRAR gave 13% compression ZFS doesn't compress a block if it can't get a certain amount of return on it. Since the default compression is less effective than RAR, you

[zfs-discuss] raidz and compression, difficulties

2008-01-26 Thread Joachim Pihl
Running SXDE (snv_70) for a file server, and I must admit I'm new to Solaris and zfs. zfs does not appear to do any compression at all, here is what I did to set it up: I created a four drive raidz array: zpool create pool raidz c0d0 c0d1 c1d0 c1d1 then an extra file system on that: zfs

Re: [zfs-discuss] raidz and compression, difficulties

2008-01-26 Thread Joachim Pihl
On Sat, 26 Jan 2008 15:20:01 +0100, Rob Logan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: it won't go back and compress old data, but if you copy the files, perhaps into a new folder, they will be compressed on that copy or move. I can't see why that should help, since the 300GB I added after enabling

Re: [zfs-discuss] raidz and compression, difficulties

2008-01-26 Thread Toby Thain
On 26-Jan-08, at 2:24 AM, Joachim Pihl wrote: Running SXDE (snv_70) for a file server, and I must admit I'm new to Solaris and zfs. zfs does not appear to do any compression at all, here is what I did to set it up: I created a four drive raidz array: zpool create pool raidz c0d0 c0d1

Re: [zfs-discuss] raidz and compression, difficulties

2008-01-26 Thread Dale Ghent
On Jan 26, 2008, at 3:24 AM, Joachim Pihl wrote: So far so good, zfs get all reports compression to be active. Now for the problem: After adding another 300GB of uncompressed .tif and .bin/.cue (audio CD) files, compression ratio is still at 1.00, indicating that no compression has