Re: [zfs-discuss] raidz faulted with only one unavailable disk

2010-10-08 Thread Cindy Swearingen
Hi Hans-Christian, Can you provide the commands you used to create this pool? Are the pool devices actually files? If so, I don't see how you have a pool device that starts without a leading slash. I tried to create one and it failed. See the example below. By default, zpool import looks in

Re: [zfs-discuss] raidz faulted with only one unavailable disk

2010-10-08 Thread Hans-Christian Otto
Hi Cindy, Can you provide the commands you used to create this pool? I don't have them anymore, no. But they were pretty much like what you wrote below. Are the pool devices actually files? If so, I don't see how you have a pool device that starts without a leading slash. I tried to create

Re: [zfs-discuss] raidz faulted with only one unavailable disk

2010-10-08 Thread Cindy Swearingen
Hi Christian, Yes, with non-standard disks you will need to provide the path to zpool import. I don't think the force import of a degraded pool would cause the pool to be faulted. In general, the I/O error is caused when ZFS can't access the underlying devices. In this case, your non-standard

Re: [zfs-discuss] raidz faulted with only one unavailable disk

2010-10-08 Thread Hans-Christian Otto
Hi Cindy, I don't think the force import of a degraded pool would cause the pool to be faulted. In general, the I/O error is caused when ZFS can't access the underlying devices. In this case, your non-standard devices names might have caused that message. as I wrote in my first mail, zpool

[zfs-discuss] raidz faulted with only one unavailable disk

2010-10-07 Thread Hans-Christian Otto
Hi, I've been playing around with zfs for a few days now, and now ended up with a faulted raidz (4 disks) with 3 disks still marked as online. Lets start with the output of zpool import: pool: tank-1 id: 15108774693087697468 state: FAULTED status: One or more devices contains corrupted