On Sun, Oct 26, 2008 at 5:31 AM, Peter Baumgartner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have a 7x150GB drive (+1 spare) raidz pool that I need to expand.
There are 6 open drive bays, so I bought 6 300GB drives and went to
add them as a raidz vdev to the existing zpool, but I didn't realize
the raidz
On Sun, Oct 26, 2008 at 4:02 AM, Mattias Pantzare [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sun, Oct 26, 2008 at 5:31 AM, Peter Baumgartner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have a 7x150GB drive (+1 spare) raidz pool that I need to expand.
There are 6 open drive bays, so I bought 6 300GB drives and went to
add
On Sun, Oct 26, 2008 at 3:00 PM, Peter Baumgartner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sun, Oct 26, 2008 at 4:02 AM, Mattias Pantzare [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sun, Oct 26, 2008 at 5:31 AM, Peter Baumgartner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have a 7x150GB drive (+1 spare) raidz pool that I need to expand.
On Sun, Oct 26, 2008 at 2:00 PM, Peter Baumgartner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
They do not have to have the same number of drivers, you can even mix
raidz and plain
disks. That is more a recommendation. Add -f to the command.
What is the risk of creating a pool consisting of two raidz vdevs
On Sun, 26 Oct 2008, Peter Baumgartner wrote:
What is the risk of creating a pool consisting of two raidz vdevs that
don't have the same number of disks?
Virtually no risk. The only matter of concern would be if the vdevs
have substantially different I/O performance and latencies since ZFS's
I have a 7x150GB drive (+1 spare) raidz pool that I need to expand.
There are 6 open drive bays, so I bought 6 300GB drives and went to
add them as a raidz vdev to the existing zpool, but I didn't realize
the raidz vdevs needed to have the same number of drives. (why is
that?)
My plan now is to,
