Bob Friesenhahn wrote:
Of course, it is my understanding that the zfs slog is written
sequentially so perhaps this applies instead:
Actually, reading up on these drives I've started to wonder about the
slog writing pattern. While these drives do seem to do a great job at
random writes,
km == Kyle McDonald kmcdon...@egenera.com writes:
km hese drives do seem to do a great job at random writes, most
km of the promise shows at sequential writes, so Does the slog
km attempt to write sequentially through the space given to it?
when writing to the slog, some
On Jul 24, 2009, at 10:46 AM, Kyle McDonald wrote:
Bob Friesenhahn wrote:
Of course, it is my understanding that the zfs slog is written
sequentially so perhaps this applies instead:
Actually, reading up on these drives I've started to wonder about
the slog writing pattern. While these
Miles Nordin wrote:
km == Kyle McDonald kmcdon...@egenera.com writes:
km hese drives do seem to do a great job at random writes, most
km of the promise shows at sequential writes, so Does the slog
km attempt to write sequentially through the space given to it?
thwack
On Fri, 24 Jul 2009, Kyle McDonald wrote:
http://www.anandtech.com/storage/showdoc.aspx?i=3531p=8
This an interesting test report. Something quite interesting for zfs
is if the write rate is continually high, then the write performance
will be limited by the FLASH erase performance,
On Jul 24, 2009, at 2:33 PM, Bob Friesenhahn wrote:
On Fri, 24 Jul 2009, Kyle McDonald wrote:
http://www.anandtech.com/storage/showdoc.aspx?i=3531p=8
This an interesting test report. Something quite interesting for
zfs is if the write rate is continually high, then the write
