Eric Schrock wrote:
On Thu, Jul 06, 2006 at 09:53:32PM +0530, Pramod Batni wrote:
offtopic query :
How can ZFS require more VM address space but not more VM ?
The real problem is VA fragmentation, not consumption. Over time, ZFS's
heavy use of the VM system causes the address space to
On Fri, Jul 07, 2006 at 09:50:47AM +0100, Darren J Moffat wrote:
Eric Schrock wrote:
On Thu, Jul 06, 2006 at 09:53:32PM +0530, Pramod Batni wrote:
offtopic query :
How can ZFS require more VM address space but not more VM ?
The real problem is VA fragmentation, not consumption.
On Fri, 7 Jul 2006, Darren J Moffat wrote:
Eric Schrock wrote:
On Thu, Jul 06, 2006 at 09:53:32PM +0530, Pramod Batni wrote:
offtopic query :
How can ZFS require more VM address space but not more VM ?
The real problem is VA fragmentation, not consumption. Over time, ZFS's
heavy use
Eric Schrock wrote:
On Thu, Jul 06, 2006 at 09:53:32PM +0530, Pramod Batni wrote:
offtopic query :
How can ZFS require more VM address space but not more VM ?
The real problem is VA fragmentation, not consumption. Over time, ZFS's
heavy use of the VM system causes the address
Siegfried Nikolaivich wrote:
Hello,
What kind of x86 CPU does ZFS prefer? In particular, what kind of CPU is
optimal when using RAID-Z with a large number of disks (8)?
My experience is that for hardware that will be used in a
server orientated role, there are a lot of considerations
Casper;
Does this mean it would be a good practice to say increase the amount of
memory and/or swap space we usually recommend if the customer intends to
use ZFS very heavily?
Sorry if this is a dumb question!
Warmest Regards
Steven Sim
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello,
What kind of
Steven Sim wrote:
Casper;
Does this mean it would be a good practice to say increase the amount of
memory and/or swap space we usually recommend if the customer intends to
use ZFS very heavily?
ZFS doesn't necessarily use more memory (physical or virtual) than UFS
it needs more VM *address
Casper;
Does this mean it would be a good practice to say increase the amount of
memory and/or swap space we usually recommend if the customer intends to
use ZFS very heavily?
Memory is always good; but it is *virtual* memory (address space) which
matters most.
The 32 bit kernel only has a
Darren J Moffat writes:
Steven Sim wrote:
Casper;
Does this mean it would be a good practice to say increase the amount of
memory and/or swap space we usually recommend if the customer intends to
use ZFS very heavily?
ZFS doesn't necessarily use more memory (physical or
Darren J Moffat wrote:
Steven Sim wrote:
Casper;
Does this mean it would be a good practice to say increase the amount
of memory and/or swap space we usually recommend if the customer
intends to use ZFS very heavily?
ZFS doesn't necessarily use more memory (physical or virtual) than
On Thu, Jul 06, 2006 at 09:53:32PM +0530, Pramod Batni wrote:
offtopic query :
How can ZFS require more VM address space but not more VM ?
The real problem is VA fragmentation, not consumption. Over time, ZFS's
heavy use of the VM system causes the address space to become
fragmented.
11 matches
Mail list logo
