On 24 September, 2007 - Claus Guttesen sent me these 1,5K bytes:
> > > The files are approx. 1 MB with an thumbnail of approx. 4 KB.
> > >
> >
> > So the 1 MB files are stored as ~8 x 128K recordsize.
> >
> > Because of
> > 5003563 use smaller "tail block" for last block of object
>
> I
> > The files are approx. 1 MB with an thumbnail of approx. 4 KB.
> >
>
> So the 1 MB files are stored as ~8 x 128K recordsize.
>
> Because of
> 5003563 use smaller "tail block" for last block of object
I tried to search for this but only saw references to this and similar
threads. Is th
Claus Guttesen writes:
> > So the 1 MB files are stored as ~8 x 128K recordsize.
> >
> > Because of
> > 5003563 use smaller "tail block" for last block of object
> >
> > The last block of you file is partially used. It will depend
> > on your filesize distribution by without that in
> So the 1 MB files are stored as ~8 x 128K recordsize.
>
> Because of
> 5003563 use smaller "tail block" for last block of object
>
> The last block of you file is partially used. It will depend
> on your filesize distribution by without that info we can
> only guess that we're wasting an
Claus Guttesen writes:
> > > I have many small - mostly jpg - files where the original file is
> > > approx. 1 MB and the thumbnail generated is approx. 4 KB. The files
> > > are currently on vxfs. I have copied all files from one partition onto
> > > a zfs-ditto. The vxfs-partition occupies 4
> > I have many small - mostly jpg - files where the original file is
> > approx. 1 MB and the thumbnail generated is approx. 4 KB. The files
> > are currently on vxfs. I have copied all files from one partition onto
> > a zfs-ditto. The vxfs-partition occupies 401 GB and zfs 449 GB. Most
> > files
Claus Guttesen wrote:
> I have many small - mostly jpg - files where the original file is
> approx. 1 MB and the thumbnail generated is approx. 4 KB. The files
> are currently on vxfs. I have copied all files from one partition onto
> a zfs-ditto. The vxfs-partition occupies 401 GB and zfs 449 GB.
> Will a different volblocksize (during creation of the partition) make
> better use of the available diskspace? Will (meta)data require less
> space if compression is enabled?
Just re-read the evil-tuning-guide and metadata is allready compressed
(http://www.solarisinternals.com/wiki/index.php/ZF
Hi.
I have many small - mostly jpg - files where the original file is
approx. 1 MB and the thumbnail generated is approx. 4 KB. The files
are currently on vxfs. I have copied all files from one partition onto
a zfs-ditto. The vxfs-partition occupies 401 GB and zfs 449 GB. Most
files uploaded are i
