On 06/03/09 09:10 PM, Aurélien Larcher wrote:
PS: for the record I roughly followed the steps of this blog entry =
http://blogs.sun.com/edp/entry/moving_from_nevada_and_live
Thanks for posting this link! Building pkg with gdb was an
interesting exercise, but it worked, with the additional
On 06/03/09 09:10 PM, Aurélien Larcher wrote:
PS: for the record I roughly followed the steps of this blog entry =
http://blogs.sun.com/edp/entry/moving_from_nevada_and_live
Thanks for posting this link! Building pkg with gcc 4.3.2 was an
interesting exercise, but it worked, with the
Hi Frank,
The reason that ZFS let you create rpool with a EFI label is at this
point, it doesn't know that this is a root pool. Its just a pool named
rpool. The best solution is for us to provide a bootable EFI label.
I see an old bug that says if you already have a pool with the same name
Frank Middleton wrote:
On 06/03/09 09:10 PM, Aurélien Larcher wrote:
PS: for the record I roughly followed the steps of this blog entry
= http://blogs.sun.com/edp/entry/moving_from_nevada_and_live
Thanks for posting this link! Building pkg with gdb was an
interesting exercise, but it
I'll comment on the parts Cindy and Lori didn't cover :-)
Frank Middleton wrote:
On 06/03/09 09:10 PM, Aurélien Larcher wrote:
PS: for the record I roughly followed the steps of this blog entry
= http://blogs.sun.com/edp/entry/moving_from_nevada_and_live
Thanks for posting this link!
Hi,
thanks Cindy for your kind answer ;)
You're right ;) After digging into the documentation I found exactly what you
say in the boot manpage
(http://docs.sun.com/app/docs/doc/819-2240/boot-1m?a=view).
So I've set the bootfs property on the zpool and everything is fine now !
My good ol'Ultra
