Hi,
Roy Sigurd Karlsbakk wrote:
Crucial RealSSD C300 has been released and showing good numbers for use as
Zil and L2ARC. Does anyone know if this unit flushes its cache on request, as
opposed to Intel units etc?
I had a chance to get my hands on a Crucial RealSSD C300/128MB yesterday and
: OpenSolaris ZFS discuss
Subject: Re: [zfs-discuss] Crucial RealSSD C300 and cache flush?
Hi,
Roy Sigurd Karlsbakk wrote:
Crucial RealSSD C300 has been released and showing good numbers for use as
Zil and L2ARC. Does anyone know if this unit flushes its cache on request, as
opposed to Intel units
Arne Jansen wrote:
Hi,
Roy Sigurd Karlsbakk wrote:
Crucial RealSSD C300 has been released and showing good numbers for use as
Zil and L2ARC. Does anyone know if this unit flushes its cache on request,
as opposed to Intel units etc?
I had a chance to get my hands on a Crucial RealSSD
Arne Jansen wrote:
Hi,
Roy Sigurd Karlsbakk wrote:
Crucial RealSSD C300 has been released and showing good numbers for use as
Zil and L2ARC. Does anyone know if this unit flushes its cache on request,
as opposed to Intel units etc?
Also the IOPS with cache flushes is quite low, 385 is
On Thu, June 24, 2010 08:58, Arne Jansen wrote:
Cross check: we pulled also while writing with cache enabled, and it lost
8 writes.
I'm SO pleased to see somebody paranoid enough to do that kind of
cross-check doing this benchmarking!
Benchmarking is hard!
So I'd say, yes, it flushes its
I'm interested in the answer to this as well.
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
