Re: [zfs-discuss] ZFS with array-level block replication (TrueCopy, SRDF, etc.)

2007-12-14 Thread Jim Dunham
Steve, I have a couple of questions and concerns about using ZFS in an environment where the underlying LUNs are replicated at a block level using products like HDS TrueCopy or EMC SRDF. Apologies in advance for the length, but I wanted the explanation to be clear. (I do realise that

Re: [zfs-discuss] ZFS with array-level block replication (TrueCopy, SRDF, etc.)

2007-12-13 Thread Richard Elling
Steve McKinty wrote: I have a couple of questions and concerns about using ZFS in an environment where the underlying LUNs are replicated at a block level using products like HDS TrueCopy or EMC SRDF. Apologies in advance for the length, but I wanted the explanation to be clear. (I do

Re: [zfs-discuss] ZFS with array-level block replication (TrueCopy, SRDF, etc.)

2007-12-13 Thread can you guess?
Great questions. 1) First issue relates to the überblock. Updates to it are assumed to be atomic, but if the replication block size is smaller than the überblock then we can't guarantee that the whole überblock is replicated as an entity. That could in theory result in a corrupt überblock

Re: [zfs-discuss] ZFS with array-level block replication (TrueCopy, SRDF, etc.)

2007-12-13 Thread Ricardo M. Correia
Steve McKinty wrote: 1) First issue relates to the überblock. Updates to it are assumed to be atomic, but if the replication block size is smaller than the überblock then we can't guarantee that the whole überblock is replicated as an entity. That could in theory result in a corrupt