-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Kory Wheatley wrote:
We created 10,000 zfs file systems with no data in them yet, and
it seems after we did this our boot up process takes over an hour.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Zfs#Current_implementation_issues
- --
Jesus Cea Avion
Are now supported Samba Acls with ZFS?
I am looking for information on the release notes of 3.0.24 version Samba, but
I can't see anything about ZFS and ACLs.
Does anybody knows something?
Thank you
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
Hello Nicholas,
Monday, February 19, 2007, 11:31:50 AM, you wrote:
2. What is the recommended version of Opensolaris to use at the moment that has iscsi? Is there a stable-like branch or is it better to stay on the N-1 update?
3. Which leads to: coming from Debian, how easy is
Hello Dennis,
Monday, February 19, 2007, 12:20:49 AM, you wrote:
On Sun, 18 Feb 2007, Calvin Liu wrote:
I want to run command rm Dis* in a folder but mis-typed a space in it
so it became rm Dis *. Unfortunately I had pressed the return button
before I noticed the mistake. So you all know
On Mon, Feb 19, 2007 at 04:07:25AM -0800, Rod wrote:
Hello,
Are now supported Samba Acls with ZFS?
I am looking for information on the release notes of 3.0.24 version Samba,
but I can't see anything about ZFS and ACLs.
Does anybody knows something?
The code is in the svn repository:
Something similar was proposed here before and IIRC someone even has a
working implementation. I don't know what happened to it.
That would be me. AFAIK, no one really wanted it. The problem that it
solves can be solved by putting snapshots in a cronjob.
--
Regards,
Jeremy
Op maandag 19 februari 2007 schreef Ivo De Decker:
The code is in the svn repository:
http://viewcvs.samba.org/cgi-bin/viewcvs.cgi/branches/SAMBA_3_0_25/source/m
odules/vfs_solarisacl.c?rev=21153view=log
There is no ZFS ACL code in there, just UFS ACL stuff.
Onno
pgp9KJmivqAQw.pgp
On Mon, Feb 19, 2007 at 03:43:49PM +0100, Rodrigo Lería wrote:
And when is going to be released 3.0.25 version?
The samba-technical mailing list has more info:
http://lists.samba.org/archive/samba-technical/2007-February/051430.html
BTW this thread is also very interesting for ZFS users:
Leon Koll writes:
An update:
Not sure is it related to the fragmentation, but I can say that serious
performance degradation in my NFS/ZFS benchmarks is a result of on-disk ZFS
data layout.
Read operations on directories (NFS3 readdirplus) are abnormally time
consuming . That
dudekula mastan writes:
If a write call attempted to write X bytes of data, and if writecall writes
only x ( hwere x X) bytes, then we call that write as short write.
-Masthan
What kind of support do you want/need ?
-r
___
zfs-discuss
On 2/19/07, Rod [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Are now supported Samba Acls with ZFS?
I am looking for information on the release notes of 3.0.24 version Samba, but
I can't see anything about ZFS and ACLs.
Does anybody knows something?
It's not there yet. I spent some time looking at this a few
Here at my university, I recently started selling disk space to users
from a server with 4.5TB of space. They purchase space and I make
them their own volume, typically with compression on and it's then
exported via NFS to their servers/workstations. So far this has gone
quite well (with
Hi Nicholas,
Actually Virtual Iron, they have a nice system at the moment with live
migration of windows guest.
Ah. We looked at them for some Windows DR. They do have a nice product.
3. Which leads to: coming from Debian, how easy is system updates? I
remember with OpenBSD system updates
On 2/20/07, Jason J. W. Williams [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ah. We looked at them for some Windows DR. They do have a nice product.
Just waiting for them to get iscsi and vlan support. Supposely sometime in
the next couple months. Combined with zfs/iscsi it will make a very nice
small data
On 2/19/07, Robert Milkowski [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
5. there's no simple answer to this question as it greatly depends on
workload and data.
One thing you should keep in mind - Solaris *has* to boot in a 64bit
mode if you wan to
use all that memory as a cache for zfs, so old x86 32bit
Akhilesh Mritunjai wrote:
I believe that the word would have gone around already, Google engineers have
published a paper on disk reliability. It might supplement the ZFS FMA
integration and well - all the numerous debates on spares etc etc over here.
Good paper. They validate the old
Richard Elling wrote:
Akhilesh Mritunjai wrote:
I believe that the word would have gone around already, Google
engineers have published a paper on disk reliability. It might
supplement the ZFS FMA integration and well - all the numerous
debates on spares etc etc over here.
Good paper. They
17 matches
Mail list logo
