Re: [zfs-discuss] ZFS causing slow boot up

2007-02-19 Thread Jesus Cea
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Kory Wheatley wrote: We created 10,000 zfs file systems with no data in them yet, and it seems after we did this our boot up process takes over an hour. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Zfs#Current_implementation_issues - -- Jesus Cea Avion

[zfs-discuss] Samba ACLs en ZFS

2007-02-19 Thread Rod
Are now supported Samba Acls with ZFS? I am looking for information on the release notes of 3.0.24 version Samba, but I can't see anything about ZFS and ACLs. Does anybody knows something? Thank you This message posted from opensolaris.org ___

Re[2]: [zfs-discuss] Zfs best practice for 2U SATA iSCSI NAS

2007-02-19 Thread Robert Milkowski
Hello Nicholas, Monday, February 19, 2007, 11:31:50 AM, you wrote: 2. What is the recommended version of Opensolaris to use at the moment that has iscsi? Is there a stable-like branch or is it better to stay on the N-1 update? 3. Which leads to: coming from Debian, how easy is

Re: [zfs-discuss] Re: [osol-help] How to recover from rm *?

2007-02-19 Thread Robert Milkowski
Hello Dennis, Monday, February 19, 2007, 12:20:49 AM, you wrote: On Sun, 18 Feb 2007, Calvin Liu wrote: I want to run command rm Dis* in a folder but mis-typed a space in it so it became rm Dis *. Unfortunately I had pressed the return button before I noticed the mistake. So you all know

Re: [zfs-discuss] Samba ACLs en ZFS

2007-02-19 Thread Ivo De Decker
On Mon, Feb 19, 2007 at 04:07:25AM -0800, Rod wrote: Hello, Are now supported Samba Acls with ZFS? I am looking for information on the release notes of 3.0.24 version Samba, but I can't see anything about ZFS and ACLs. Does anybody knows something? The code is in the svn repository:

Re: [zfs-discuss] Re: [osol-help] How to recover from rm *?

2007-02-19 Thread Jeremy Teo
Something similar was proposed here before and IIRC someone even has a working implementation. I don't know what happened to it. That would be me. AFAIK, no one really wanted it. The problem that it solves can be solved by putting snapshots in a cronjob. -- Regards, Jeremy

Re: [zfs-discuss] Samba ACLs en ZFS

2007-02-19 Thread Onno Molenkamp
Op maandag 19 februari 2007 schreef Ivo De Decker: The code is in the svn repository: http://viewcvs.samba.org/cgi-bin/viewcvs.cgi/branches/SAMBA_3_0_25/source/m odules/vfs_solarisacl.c?rev=21153view=log There is no ZFS ACL code in there, just UFS ACL stuff. Onno pgp9KJmivqAQw.pgp

Re: [zfs-discuss] Samba ACLs en ZFS

2007-02-19 Thread Ivo De Decker
On Mon, Feb 19, 2007 at 03:43:49PM +0100, Rodrigo LerĂ­a wrote: And when is going to be released 3.0.25 version? The samba-technical mailing list has more info: http://lists.samba.org/archive/samba-technical/2007-February/051430.html BTW this thread is also very interesting for ZFS users:

Re: [zfs-discuss] Re: SPEC SFS benchmark of NFS/ZFS/B56 - please help to improve it!

2007-02-19 Thread Roch - PAE
Leon Koll writes: An update: Not sure is it related to the fragmentation, but I can say that serious performance degradation in my NFS/ZFS benchmarks is a result of on-disk ZFS data layout. Read operations on directories (NFS3 readdirplus) are abnormally time consuming . That

Re: [zfs-discuss] Is ZFS file system supports short writes ?

2007-02-19 Thread Roch - PAE
dudekula mastan writes: If a write call attempted to write X bytes of data, and if writecall writes only x ( hwere x X) bytes, then we call that write as short write. -Masthan What kind of support do you want/need ? -r ___ zfs-discuss

Re: [zfs-discuss] Samba ACLs en ZFS

2007-02-19 Thread Eric Enright
On 2/19/07, Rod [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Are now supported Samba Acls with ZFS? I am looking for information on the release notes of 3.0.24 version Samba, but I can't see anything about ZFS and ACLs. Does anybody knows something? It's not there yet. I spent some time looking at this a few

[zfs-discuss] Exporting zvol properties to .zfs

2007-02-19 Thread Dale Ghent
Here at my university, I recently started selling disk space to users from a server with 4.5TB of space. They purchase space and I make them their own volume, typically with compression on and it's then exported via NFS to their servers/workstations. So far this has gone quite well (with

Re: [zfs-discuss] Zfs best practice for 2U SATA iSCSI NAS

2007-02-19 Thread Jason J. W. Williams
Hi Nicholas, Actually Virtual Iron, they have a nice system at the moment with live migration of windows guest. Ah. We looked at them for some Windows DR. They do have a nice product. 3. Which leads to: coming from Debian, how easy is system updates? I remember with OpenBSD system updates

Re: [zfs-discuss] Zfs best practice for 2U SATA iSCSI NAS

2007-02-19 Thread Nicholas Lee
On 2/20/07, Jason J. W. Williams [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Ah. We looked at them for some Windows DR. They do have a nice product. Just waiting for them to get iscsi and vlan support. Supposely sometime in the next couple months. Combined with zfs/iscsi it will make a very nice small data

Re: Re[2]: [zfs-discuss] Zfs best practice for 2U SATA iSCSI NAS

2007-02-19 Thread Nicholas Lee
On 2/19/07, Robert Milkowski [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: 5. there's no simple answer to this question as it greatly depends on workload and data. One thing you should keep in mind - Solaris *has* to boot in a 64bit mode if you wan to use all that memory as a cache for zfs, so old x86 32bit

Re: [zfs-discuss] Google paper on disk reliability

2007-02-19 Thread Richard Elling
Akhilesh Mritunjai wrote: I believe that the word would have gone around already, Google engineers have published a paper on disk reliability. It might supplement the ZFS FMA integration and well - all the numerous debates on spares etc etc over here. Good paper. They validate the old

Re: [zfs-discuss] Google paper on disk reliability

2007-02-19 Thread Torrey McMahon
Richard Elling wrote: Akhilesh Mritunjai wrote: I believe that the word would have gone around already, Google engineers have published a paper on disk reliability. It might supplement the ZFS FMA integration and well - all the numerous debates on spares etc etc over here. Good paper. They