Hello Richard,
Monday, May 5, 2008, 4:12:23 PM, you wrote:
RE> Rustam wrote:
>> Hello Robert,
>>
>>> Which would happen if you have problem with HW and you're getting
>>> wring checksums on both side of your mirrors. Maybe PS?
>>>
>>> Try memtest anyway or sunvts
>>>
>> Unfortunately, Sun
Hello Cyril,
Sunday, May 4, 2008, 11:34:28 AM, you wrote:
CP> On Sun, May 4, 2008 at 11:42 AM, Jeff Bonwick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Oh, and here's the source code, for the curious:
>>
CP> [snipped]
>>
>> label_write(fd, offsetof(vdev_label_t, vl_uberblock),
>> 1ULL <<
Great tool, any chance we can have it integrated into zpool(1M) so that
it can find and "fixup" on import detached vdevs as new pools ?
I'd think it would be reasonable to extend the meaning of
'zpool import -D' to list detached vdevs as well as destroyed pools.
--
Darren J Moffat
__
Hi all,
I'm new to this list and ZFS, so forgive me if I'm re-hashing an old
topic. I'm also using ZFS on FreeBSD not Solaris, so forgive me for
being a heretic ;-)
I recently setup a home NAS box and decided that ZFS is the only
sensible way to manage 4TB of disks. The primary use of the b
Hi,
I have been running Open Solaris NV42 for the past year for my home NAS. Here
is my setup:-
root (ufs) HD1
/tank - 4 HD running raidz configuration.
Yesterday, my root hard drive crash and I was not able to boot up my system
anymore. My question are:
1. What is the best way to recove
On 06 May, 2008 - LyeBeng Ong sent me these 0,7K bytes:
> Hi,
>
> I have been running Open Solaris NV42 for the past year for my home NAS.
> Here is my setup:-
>
> root (ufs) HD1
> /tank - 4 HD running raidz configuration.
>
> Yesterday, my root hard drive crash and I was not able to boot up
Intel EagleLake boards look very promising for this purpose. Compact low-power
home NAS but with some power to it. Onboard gigabit.
http://www.mini-itx.com/2008/03/06/intels-eaglelake-mini-itx-boards
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
zf
On Mon, May 5, 2008 at 10:23 PM, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> cannot share 'tank/software': smb add share failed
>
> you meant to post this in storage-discuss
> but type:
>
> chmod 777 /tank/software
> zfs set sharesmb=name=software tank/software
Wow. Sometimes the simplest solutions are the ha
I'll have to check out the EagleLake stuff. I did look at the Jetway at one
point in time, but forgot why I initially ruled it out. Might be worth a
re-visit.
I also dug up a notice that Kontron was coming out with one that looks
promising as well, the KT690/mITX:
http://us.kontron.com/produ
On May 5, 2008, at 9:51 PM, Bill McGonigle wrote:
> Is it also true that ZFS can't be re-implemented in GPLv2 code
> because then the CDDL-based patent protections don't apply?
Some of it has already been done:
http://src.opensolaris.org/source/xref/onnv/onnv-gate/usr/src/grub/grub-0.95/stage2
On May 6, 2008, at 12:54, eric kustarz wrote:
> Some of it has already been done:
> http://src.opensolaris.org/source/xref/onnv/onnv-gate/usr/src/grub/
> grub-0.95/stage2/zfs-include/uberblock_impl.h
That file says 'Copyright 2007 Sun Microsystems, Inc.', though, so
Sun has the rights to do th
> I assume that ZFS quotas are enforced even if the current
> size and space free is not included in the user visible 'df'.
> Is that not true?
>
> Presumably applications get some unexpected error when the
> quota limit is hit since the client OS does not know the real
> amount of space fre
On Tue, 6 May 2008, Bill McGonigle wrote:
>
> That file says 'Copyright 2007 Sun Microsystems, Inc.', though, so
> Sun has the rights to do this. But being GPLv2 code, why do I have
> any patent rights to include/redistribute that grub code in my
> (theoretical) product (let's assume it does somet
All,
if one has data files on a system disk and one wants to make a zfs
volume of those non-OS filesystems,
will it take more of a performance hit as a zfs volume or as a regular
filesystem or no difference at all
Thanks
Peter
--
Peter Wilk
Technical Support Engineer
Sun Microsystems, Inc.
O
Peter:
> if one has data files on a system disk and one wants to make a zfs
> volume of those non-OS filesystems,
> will it take more of a performance hit as a zfs volume or as a regular
> filesystem or no difference at all
Forgive me if I do not understand your question. Do you have a
"non-OS"
Is there a whitepaper or presentation which directly compares ZFS snapshot
versus conventional disk storage subsystem based snapshot, for instance the
Sun StorageTek 6xxx/25xx family?
Thanks and regards,
Jerry Daniel, SE
Sun Microsystems, Inc.
(+1) 816.210.3233 cell phone
(+1) 877.229.4324
Solaris 10 update 5 was released 05/2008, but no zpool shrink :-( Any update?
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
On Tue, 6 May 2008, Brad Bender wrote:
> Solaris 10 update 5 was released 05/2008, but no zpool shrink :-( Any update?
IIRC, the ability to shrink a pool isn't even in Nevada yet,
so it'll be *some time* before it'll be in an S10 update...
--
Rich Teer, SCSA, SCNA, SCSECA
CEO,
My Online Home
On May 6, 2008, at 14:59, Bob Friesenhahn wrote:
> By releasing this bit of code to Grub under the GPL v2 license, Sun
> has effectively transferred rights to use that scrap of code (in
> any context) regardless of any Sun patents which may apply.
Ah, yes, I was wrong on this one - I see Sect
19 matches
Mail list logo
