AMD Geodes are 32-bit only. I haven't heard any mention that they will
_ever_ be 64-bit. But, honestly, this and the Via chip aren't really
ever going to be targets for Solaris. That is, they simply aren't (any
substantial) part of the audience we're trying to reach with Solaris x86.
I'm
Erik Trimble wrote:
Artem Kachitchkine wrote:
AMD Geodes are 32-bit only. I haven't heard any mention that they
will _ever_ be 64-bit. But, honestly, this and the Via chip aren't
really ever going to be targets for Solaris. That is, they simply
aren't (any substantial) part of the
I was wondering if anyone could recommend hardware
forr a ZFS-based NAS for home use.
The 'zfs on 32-bit' thread has scared me of a mini-itx fanless
setup, so I'm looking at sparc or opteron. Ideally it would:
a) run quiet (blade 100/150 is ok, x4100 ain't :) )
b) take advantage of cheap disks
Hello Nate,
I have few issues about ZFS and virtualization:
[b]Virtualization and performance[/b]
When filesystem traffic occurs on a zpool
containing
only spindles dedicated to this zpool i/o can be
distributed evenly. When the zpool is located on a
lun sliced from a raid group
having just upgraded to nv42 zpool status tells me I need to upgrade the ondisk
version.
zpool version points me at
http://www.opensolaris.org/os/community/zfs/version/3 :
: sigma TS 6 $; zpool upgrade -v
This system is currently running ZFS version 3.
The following versions are suppored:
Mark Shellenbaum wrote:
...
So we have a bunch of stuff in the in-core delete queue, but no threads
to process them. The fact that we don't have the threads is related to
the bug that Tabriz is working on.
Hi Mark,
after installing your fixes from three days ago and (cough!) ensuring
that my
On 6/23/06, Roch [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Joe Little writes:
On 6/22/06, Bill Moore [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hey Joe. We're working on some ZFS changes in this area, and if you
could run an experiment for us, that would be great. Just do this:
echo 'zil_disable/W1' | mdb -kw
I was wondering if anyone could recommend hardware
forr a ZFS-based NAS for home use.
setup, so I'm looking at sparc or opteron. Ideally it
would:
a) run quiet (blade 100/150 is ok, x4100 ain't :) )
Not much space in a Blade 100/150 for multiple disks, but it is quiet and cheap.
For NAS
Hi,
I just set up an install server on my notebook and of course all the installer
data is on a ZFS volume. I love the zfs compression=on command!
It seems that the standard ./add_install_client script from the S10U2 Tools
directory creates an entry in /etc/vfstab for a loopback mount of the
Saturating 100Mbit with a 64-bit CPU and redundant disks for $300-400 Pounds
may be tough.
Anything in the market can saturate 100Mbit easily; even with a single
cheap IDE disk. The disks are generally a factor 5-10 faster than the
100Mbit network.
Casper
Darren J Moffat wrote:
This is an @opensolaris.org alias it is about working together as a
community and identifying problems and discovering solutions. I don't
think it is at all appropriate to bring up Sun business choices here.
Where that is appropriate is when Sun employees need to
Constantin Gonzalez [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Is this a known issue?
Yes, I've raised this during ZFS Beta as SDR-0192. For some reason, I
don't have a CR here.
Rainer
--
-
Rainer Orth, Faculty of
Dick Davies wrote:
I was wondering if anyone could recommend hardware
forr a ZFS-based NAS for home use.
The 'zfs on 32-bit' thread has scared me of a mini-itx fanless
setup, so I'm looking at sparc or opteron. Ideally it would:
a) run quiet (blade 100/150 is ok, x4100 ain't :) )
b) take
Saturating 100Mbit with a 64-bit CPU and redundant
disks for $300-400 Pounds may be tough.
Anything in the market can saturate 100Mbit easily;
even with a single
cheap IDE disk. The disks are generally a factor
5-10 faster than the
100Mbit network.
Casper
Indeed, I stand
Dick Davies wrote:
I was wondering if anyone could recommend hardware
forr a ZFS-based NAS for home use.
The 'zfs on 32-bit' thread has scared me of a mini-itx fanless
setup, so I'm looking at sparc or opteron. Ideally it would:
I think the issue with ZFS on 32-bit is revolving around the
Joe Little wrote:
On 6/23/06, Roch [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Joe, you know this but for the benefit of others, I have to
highlight that running any NFS server this way, may cause
silent data corruption from client's point of view.
Whenever a server keeps data in RAM this way and does not
I should copy this to the list.-- Forwarded message --On 6/23/06,
Joe Little [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I can post back to Roch what this latency is. I think the latency is aconstant regardless of the zil or not. all that I do by disabling thezil is that I'm able to submit larger
How about it folks - would it be a good idea for me to explore what it
takes to get such a bug/RFE setup implemented for the ZFS community on
OpenSolaris.org?
what's wrong with http://bugs.opensolaris.org/bugdatabase/index.jsp for
finding bugs?
i think we've been really good about taking
On 6/23/06, Richard Elling [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
comment on analysis below...Tao Chen wrote: === Top 5 Devices with largest number of I/Os === DEVICEREAD AVG.ms MBWRITE AVG.ms MBIOs SEEK
-- -- - -- - sd16 0.340 4948 387.88413 4954 0% sd26 0.250
EK == eric kustarz [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
EK what's wrong with http://bugs.opensolaris.org/bugdatabase/index.jsp
EK for finding bugs?
Unless they've fixed it recently, the keywords search doesn't actually
check against the Bugster keywords field.
And the information presented is pretty
On Jun 23, 2006, at 1:09 PM, eric kustarz wrote:
How about it folks - would it be a good idea for me to explore
what it takes to get such a bug/RFE setup implemented for the ZFS
community on OpenSolaris.org?
what's wrong with http://bugs.opensolaris.org/bugdatabase/index.jsp
for
* Erik Trimble [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2006-06-23 11:15]:
It is a good start (yes, I know it's an interface to Bugster, just as
the Java one I pointed out is too - in fact, it's probably the same
code). And, I'm certainly not complaining about how well people have
been taking to and addressing
On Fri, Jun 23, 2006 at 02:20:54PM -0400, Dale Ghent wrote:
Second, while there is a way for Joe Random to submit a bug, there is
zero way for Joe Random to interact with a bug. No voting to bump or
drop a priority, no easy way to find hot topic bugs, no way to add
one's own notes to the
Please refer all followups to this thread over to the
[EMAIL PROTECTED] list.
On Fri, 2006-06-23 at 11:27 -0700, Stephen Hahn wrote:
* Erik Trimble [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2006-06-23 11:15]:
It is a good start (yes, I know it's an interface to Bugster, just as
the Java one I pointed out is too
While dd'ing to an nfs filesystem, half of the bandwidth is unaccounted
for. What dd reports amounts to almost exactly half of what zpool iostat
or iostat show; even after accounting for the overhead of the two mirrored
vdevs. Would anyone care to guess where it may be going?
(This is measured
25 matches
Mail list logo
