Out of curiosity, why are you trying to do this?
A very valid question, I work in Sun's OEM Software organization, and
for the first time we are seeing real opportunities for Solaris as an
embedded OS for appliances. Countless Linux devices boot from flash in
a matter of seconds and ju
On Fri, Aug 04, 2006 at 05:48:59PM -0400, Jim Connors wrote:
> Richard Elling wrote:
> >Jim Connors wrote:
> >>
> >>Working to get ZFS to run on a minimal Solaris 10 U2 configuration.
> >
> >What does "minimal" mean? Most likely, you are missing something.
> > -- richard
> Yeah. Looking at pac
Richard Elling wrote:
Jim Connors wrote:
Working to get ZFS to run on a minimal Solaris 10 U2 configuration.
What does "minimal" mean? Most likely, you are missing something.
-- richard
Yeah. Looking at package and SMF dependencies plus a whole lot of and
trial and error, I've currentl
Jim Connors wrote:
Working to get ZFS to run on a minimal Solaris 10 U2 configuration.
What does "minimal" mean? Most likely, you are missing something.
-- richard
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.
On Fri, Aug 04, 2006 at 10:29:49AM -0700, Brad Plecs wrote:
>
> You *can* replace individual devices in the vdev, but I haven't tested
> whether or
> not the raidz grows to use the full size of the disks once I replace all the
> 36 GB drives
> with 73 GB drives. I suspect not.
Actually, it d
> Yeah, I ran into that in my testing, too. I suspect
> it's something
> that will come up in testing a LOT more than in real
> production use.
I disagree. I can see lots of situations where you want to attach new storage
and
remove or retire old storage from an existing pool. It would be grea
Eric Schrock wrote:
This indicates that share(1M) didn't produce any output, but returned
a non-zero exit status. I'm not sure why this would happen - can you
run the following by hand?
# share /export
# echo $?
bash-3.00# share
bash-3.00# share /export
bash-3.00# echo $?
0
Looks like the
Hi
I logged CR 6457216 to track this for now.
Enda
Enda o'Connor - Sun Microsystems Ireland - Software Engineer wrote:
Enda o'Connor - Sun Microsystems Ireland - Software Engineer wrote:
Hi
I guess the problem is that David is using smpatch (our automate
Enda o'Connor - Sun Microsystems Ireland - Software Engineer wrote:
Hi
I guess the problem is that David is using smpatch (our automated patching
system )
So in theory he is up to date on his patches
( he has since removed
122660-02
122658-02
122640-05
)
Hi
I guess the problem is that David is using smpatch (our automated patching
system )
So in theory he is up to date on his patches
( he has since removed
122660-02
122658-02
122640-05
)
So when I install the following onto a system ( SPARC S10 FCS ) with two
zones already running:
1
On Fri, Aug 04, 2006 at 09:48:37AM -0700, Eric Schrock wrote:
> This indicates that share(1M) didn't produce any output, but returned
> a non-zero exit status. I'm not sure why this would happen - can you
> run the following by hand?
>
> # share /export
> # echo $?
>
> Incidentally, the explicit
This indicates that share(1M) didn't produce any output, but returned
a non-zero exit status. I'm not sure why this would happen - can you
run the following by hand?
# share /export
# echo $?
Incidentally, the explicit 'zfs share' isn't needed, as we automatically
share the filesystem when the o
Working to get ZFS to run on a minimal Solaris 10 U2 configuration. In
this scenario, ZFS is included the miniroot which is booted into RAM.
When trying to share one of the filesystems, an assertion is raised -
see below. If the version of source on OpenSolaris.org matches
Solaris 10 U
Thanks for a quick answer. I suppose it was not much of a ZFS question after
all.
Regards,
Pierre
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-dis
Darren J Moffat wrote:
Richard Lowe wrote:
Patrick Petit wrote:
Hi,
Some additional elements. Irrespective of the SCSI error reported
earlier, I have established that Solaris dom0 hangs anyway when a
domU is booted from a disk image located on an emulated ZFS volume.
Has this been also o
Richard Lowe wrote:
Patrick Petit wrote:
Hi,
Some additional elements. Irrespective of the SCSI error reported
earlier, I have established that Solaris dom0 hangs anyway when a
domU is booted from a disk image located on an emulated ZFS volume.
Has this been also observed by other members
16 matches
Mail list logo
