I have set up a Solaris 10 U2 06/06 system that has basic patches to the latest
-19 kernel patch and latest zfs genesis etc as recommended. I have set up a
basic pool (local) and a bunch of sub-pools (local/mail, local/mail/shire.net,
local/mail/shire.net/o, local/jailextras/shire.net/irsfl,
On Fri, Sep 22, 2006 at 03:38:05PM +0200, Roch wrote:
http://blogs.sun.com/roch/entry/zfs_and_oltp
After reading this page and taking into consideration my (not so big) knowledge
of ZFS it came to my mind that putting e.g. Oracle on both UFS+DIO _and_
ZFS would be the best solution
Harley Gorrell writes:
On Fri, 22 Sep 2006, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Are you just trying to measure ZFS's read performance here?
That is what I started looking at. We scrounged around
and found a set of 300GB drives to replace the old ones we
started with. Comparing these new
All,
Anyone for this?
I haven't received any informations regarding this. This is my third
attempt and i would appreciate if you can
send me any info you have.
TIA,
Arlina
NOTE: Please email me directly as i'm not on this alias.
---BeginMessage---
I'm resending this again since i haven't
On Mon, 25 Sep 2006, Roch wrote:
This looks like on the second run, you had lots more free
memory and mkfile completed near memcpy speed.
Both times the system was near idle.
Something is awry on the first pass though. Then,
zpool iostat 1
can put some lights on this. IO will
Harley Gorrell wrote:
I do wonder what accounts for the improvement -- seek
time, transfer rate, disk cache, or something else? Does
anywone have a dtrace script to measure this which they
would share?
You might also be seeing the effects of defect management. As
drives get older, they
Chad Leigh wrote:
I have set up a Solaris 10 U2 06/06 system that has basic patches to the latest
-19 kernel patch and latest zfs genesis etc as recommended. I have set up a
basic pool (local) and a bunch of sub-pools (local/mail, local/mail/shire.net,
local/mail/shire.net/o,
On Sep 25, 2006, at 12:18 PM, eric kustarz wrote:
Chad Leigh wrote:
I have set up a Solaris 10 U2 06/06 system that has basic patches
to the latest -19 kernel patch and latest zfs genesis etc as
recommended. I have set up a basic pool (local) and a bunch of
sub-pools (local/mail,
Arlina,
The ZFS GUI runs within the Java Web Console, so there is no port
conflict.
My guess is that the Java Web Console was upgraded to version 3.0.x,
which breaks the ZFS GUI. Run pkginfo SUNWmcon to verify.
The bug ID for this is:
6473968 ZFS GUI does not function under Lockhart 3.0 in
On Sep 25, 2006, at 1:15 PM, Mike Kupfer wrote:
Chad == Chad Leigh -- Shire.Net LLC [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Chad On Sep 25, 2006, at 12:18 PM, eric kustarz wrote:
You can also grab a snoop trace to see what packets are not being
responded too?
Chad If I can catch it happening. Most of
Good day all. Please respond to me directly as I am not on this alias.
I have a customer who is develping his site's implementation of zfs,
my case come to me because he is using Solaris 10 6/06 x86 on a Sun Fire
V40z (an x86 unit). He had no problem assembling and mounting a zfs
volume,
Just thought I'd share some recent experiences. I had an Adaptec ASH-1233 PCI
controller (based on the Silicon Image SII0680ACL144 chip) in my Nevada build
45 system (a white box PC based on the AMD 3200+ CPU). This system is the
backup for my main home server. Using zfs send | rsh zfs receive
On Sep 25, 2006, at 2:49 PM, Mike Kupfer wrote:
Chad == Chad Leigh -- Shire.Net LLC [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Chad There seems to be no packet headers or time stamps or
anything --
Chad just a lot of binary data. What am I looking for?
Use snoop -i capture_file to decode the capture
other example:
rsyncing from/to the same zpool:
device r/sw/s Mr/s Mw/s wait actv svc_t %w %b
c625.0 276.51.33.8 1.9 16.5 61.1 0 135
sd44 6.0 158.30.30.4 1.9 15.5 106.2 33 [b]100[/b]
sd45 6.0 37.10.31.1 0.0
Chad == Chad Leigh -- Shire.Net LLC [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Chad so -t a should show wall clock time
The capture file always records absolute time. So you (just) need to
use -t a when you decode the capture file.
Sorry for not making the clear earlier.
mike
On Sep 25, 2006, at 3:54 PM, Mike Kupfer wrote:
Chad == Chad Leigh -- Shire.Net LLC [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Chad so -t a should show wall clock time
The capture file always records absolute time. So you (just) need to
use -t a when you decode the capture file.
Sorry for not making the
Edward,
/etc/zpool.cache contains data pointing to devices involved in a
zpool. Changes to ZFS datasets are reflected in the actual zpool so
destroying a zfs dataset should not change zpool.cache.
zfs destroy is the correct command to destroy a file system.
It will be easier if we can know
-
17 matches
Mail list logo
