Hello Sergio,
Wednesday, October 25, 2006, 1:29:25 AM, you wrote:
Hi.
If I create an Oracle volume using zfs like this
# zpool create -f oracle c0t1d0
# zfs create -V 500mb oracle/system.dbf
# cd /dev/zvol/rdsk/oracle
# chown oracle:oinstall system.dbf
Would it be similar to a vxvm
Hello Matthew,
Wednesday, October 25, 2006, 7:08:56 AM, you wrote:
MA Robert Milkowski wrote:
Hi.
On nfs clients which are mounting file system f3-1/d611 I can see 3-5s
periods of 100% busy (iostat) and almost no IOs issued to nfs server, on nfs
server at the same time disk activity
On Tue, Oct 24, 2006 at 03:31:41PM -0400, Dale Ghent wrote:
Okay, then if the person can stand to lose even more space, do zfs
mirroring on each JBOD. Then we'd have a mirror of mirrors instead of
a mirror of raidz's.
Remember, the OP wanted chassis-level redundancy as well as
Hi.
Today again the same problem - however not that severe so I'm not sure if
below lockstat is representative.
# lockstat -kgIW sleep 5 | less
Profiling interrupt: 1968 events in 5.072 seconds (388 events/sec)
Count genr cuml rcnt nsec Hottest CPU+PILCaller
hi Thomas,
On Tue, 2006-10-24 at 14:58 -0700, Thomas Maier-Komor wrote:
Is this a known problem/bug?
Yep, that sounds a bit like 6482985.
$ zfs snapshot zpool/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
internal error: unexpected error 16 at line 2302 of ../common/libzfs_dataset.c
this occured on:
$ uname -a
ozan s. yigit wrote:
we thought we would try adding a disk to an existing raidz pool
named backup:
# zpool status
...
NAMESTATE READ WRITE CKSUM
backup ONLINE 0 0 0
raidz ONLINE 0 0 0
c4t2d0 ONLINE 0
eric kustarz wrote [in part]
What bits are you running?
s10r2.
thumper-12tb# zpool add backup c7t7d0
invalid vdev specification
use '-f' to override the following errors:
mismatched replication level: pool uses raidz and new vdev is disk
interesting. that helps.
Did you use the -f flag
IBM has contributed code for NFSv4 ACLs under AIX's JFS; hopefully Sun will not
tarry in following their lead for ZFS.
http://lists.samba.org/archive/samba-cvs/2006-September/070855.html
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
zfs-discuss
On Oct 25, 2006, at 15:38, Roger Ripley wrote:
IBM has contributed code for NFSv4 ACLs under AIX's JFS; hopefully
Sun will not tarry in following their lead for ZFS.
http://lists.samba.org/archive/samba-cvs/2006-September/070855.html
I thought this was still in draft:
On Wed, Jonathan Edwards wrote:
On Oct 25, 2006, at 15:38, Roger Ripley wrote:
IBM has contributed code for NFSv4 ACLs under AIX's JFS; hopefully
Sun will not tarry in following their lead for ZFS.
http://lists.samba.org/archive/samba-cvs/2006-September/070855.html
I thought this
Hello,
just installed build 50, and typed 'zfs' in a shell.
I got the help message, and was surprised with it :
bash-3.00# zfs
commande manquante
syntaxe : zfs command args ...
où 'command' est l'une des possibilités suivantes :
create [[-o property=value] ... ]
11 matches
Mail list logo