I'm writing a couple scripts to automate backups and snapshots, and I'm
finding myself cringing every time I call 'zfs destroy' to get rid of a
snapshot, because a small typo could take out the original filesystem
instead of a snapshot. Would it be possible to add a flag (maybe -t type)
to zfs
On Tue, Oct 23, 2007 at 09:55:58AM -0700, Scott Laird wrote:
I'm writing a couple scripts to automate backups and snapshots, and I'm
finding myself cringing every time I call 'zfs destroy' to get rid of a
snapshot, because a small typo could take out the original filesystem
instead of a
On Tue, 23 Oct 2007, A Darren Dunham wrote:
On Tue, Oct 23, 2007 at 09:55:58AM -0700, Scott Laird wrote:
I'm writing a couple scripts to automate backups and snapshots, and I'm
finding myself cringing every time I call 'zfs destroy' to get rid of a
snapshot, because a small typo could take
Le 21 oct. 07 à 02:40, Vincent Fox a écrit :
We had a Sun Engineer on-site recently who said this:
We should set our array controllers to sequential I/O *even* if we
are doing random I/O if we are using ZFS.
This is because the Arc cache is already grouping requests up
sequentially so
