I posted an earlier reply to zones-discuss, but I didn't copy all of the forums
in the original posting. I'm doing so now. I am also correcting some errors in
my earlier reply:
Yes, it is possible to share a zfs dataset that has been added to a labeled
zone.
Set the mountpoint property of
I am afraid a search does not get much on this subject, hence this post.
Is there a plan for a Nevada build to include zfs root/boot on Sparc
architecture?
When?
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
Mauro Mozzarelli wrote:
I am afraid a search does not get much on this subject, hence this post.
Is there a plan for a Nevada build to include zfs root/boot on Sparc
architecture?
When?
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
Restarting this thread... I've just finished reading the article, A
look at MySQL on ZFS:
http://dev.mysql.com/tech-resources/articles/mysql-zfs.html
The section MySQL Performance Comparison: ZFS vs. UFS on Open
Solaris looks interesting...
Rayson
___
Following up, I got this message from Lori:
We are aiming to integrate zfs boot for both sparc and x86
into Nevada around the end of this calendar year.
Lori
Lori,
Thank you for your reply, I will be probably one of the first to try it.
Mauro
This message posted from
On Mon, Oct 29, 2007 at 08:55:21AM -0700, Mauro Mozzarelli wrote:
Following up, I got this message from Lori:
We are aiming to integrate zfs boot for both sparc and x86
into Nevada around the end of this calendar year.
Lori
Lori,
Thank you for your reply, I will be probably one
Hello,
Is there a way to replace a standalone drive with a raidz implimentation with
zfs?
ie zpool replace bigpool c2t1d0 raidz c2t3d0 c2t4d0 c2t5d0
etc..
thanks
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
Hello Nigel,
Thursday, October 25, 2007, 12:02:04 PM, you wrote:
NS Nice to see some progress, at last, on this bug:
NS http://bugs.opensolaris.org/view_bug.do?bug_id=6417779
NS ZFS: I/O failure (write on ...) -- need to reallocate writes
NS Commit to Fix: snv_77
NS
Hi Tony,
John posted the URL to his article to the databases-discuss this
morning, and I only took a very quick look.
May be you can join that list and discuss further regarding the configurations?
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/databases-discuss
Rayson
On 10/29/07, Tony Leone
Hello Roch,
Wednesday, October 24, 2007, 3:49:45 PM, you wrote:
RP I would suspect the checksum part of this (I do believe it's being
RP actively worked on) :
RP 6533726 single-threaded checksum raidz2 parity
RP calculations limit write bandwidth on thumper
I guess it's single
Hi Stephen,
No, you can't replace a one device with a raidz device, but you can
create a mirror from one device by using zpool attach. See the output
below.
The other choice is to add to an existing raidz configuration. See
the output below.
I thought we had an RFE to expand an existing raidz
We have a pair of 3511s that are host to a couple of ZFS filesystems.
Over the weekend we had a power hit, and when we brought the server that
the 3511s are attached to back up, the ZFS filesystem was hosed. Are we
totally out of luck here? There's nothing here that we can't recover,
given
hello folks, I am running Solaris 10 U3 and I have small problem that I dont
know how to fix...
I had a pool of two drives:
bash-3.00# zpool status
pool: mypool
state: ONLINE
scrub: none requested
config:
NAME STATE READ WRITE CKSUM
mypoolONLINE
What does 'fmdump -eV' show? You might also want to try the following
and run 'zpool status' in the background:
# dtrace -n 'zfs_ereport_post:entry{stack()}'
This will provide additional information of the source of the ereports
isn't obvious.
- Eric
On Mon, Oct 29, 2007 at 03:44:14PM
Hello,
I'm experiencing major checksum errors when using a syba silicon image 3114
based pci sata controller w/ nonraid firmware. I've tested by copying data via
sftp and smb. With everything I've swapped out, I can't fathom this being a
hardware problem. There have been quite a few blog
Hi,
I was first attracted to ZFS (and therefore OpenSolaris) because I thought that
ZFS allowed the used of different sized disks in raidz pools without wasted
disk space. Further research has confirmed that this isn't possible--by default.
I have seen a little bit of documentation around
Ed Saipetch wrote:
Hello,
I'm experiencing major checksum errors when using a syba silicon image 3114
based pci sata controller w/ nonraid firmware. I've tested by copying data
via sftp and smb. With everything I've swapped out, I can't fathom this
being a hardware problem.
I can.
Here's what I've done so far:
The obvious thing to test is the drive controller, so maybe you should do that
:)
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
Neal Pollack wrote:
Ed Saipetch wrote:
Hello,
I'm experiencing major checksum errors when using a syba silicon
image 3114 based pci sata controller w/ nonraid firmware. I've
tested by copying data via sftp and smb. With everything I've
swapped out, I can't fathom this being a
ZFS copies attribute could be used to make this easy, but with all the talk
of kernel panics on drive loss and non-guaranteed block placement across
different disks, I don't like ZFS copies. (see threads like
http://mail.opensolaris.org/pipermail/zfs-discuss/2007-October/043279.html )
The
On 10/30/07, Edward Saipetch [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
As a side note, what SATA cards are people having luck with?
Running b74, I'm very happy with the Marvell mv88sx6081-based Supermicro card:
http://www.supermicro.com/products/accessories/addon/AoC-SAT2-MV8.cfm
Will Murnane wrote:
On 10/30/07, Edward Saipetch [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
As a side note, what SATA cards are people having luck with?
Running b74, I'm very happy with the Marvell mv88sx6081-based Supermicro card:
http://www.supermicro.com/products/accessories/addon/AoC-SAT2-MV8.cfm
Edward Saipetch wrote:
Neal Pollack wrote:
Ed Saipetch wrote:
Hello,
I'm experiencing major checksum errors when using a syba silicon
image 3114 based pci sata controller w/ nonraid firmware. I've
tested by copying data via sftp and smb. With everything I've
swapped out, I can't
23 matches
Mail list logo
