Ed Saipetch wrote:
To answer a number of questions:
Regarding different controllers, I've tried 2 Syba Sil 3114 controllers
purchased about 4 months apart. I've tried 5.4.3 firmware with one and
5.4.13 with another. Maybe Syba makes crappy Sil 3114 cards but it's the
same one that
Your best bet is to call Tech Support and not Sales. I've found LSI
tech support to be very responsive to individual customers.
Thanks. I'll try them. I eventually noticed you could actually get the number
to them under the LSI offices category of their find-your-contact web form
system
Eric Haycraft wrote:
The drives (6 in total) are external (eSATA) ones, so they have their own
enclosure that I can't open without voiding the warranty... I destroyed one
enclosure trying out ways to get it to work and learned that there was no way
to open them up without wrecking the case
Nathan Dietsch wrote:
Hello All,
I am working with a customer on a solution where ZFS looks very
promising. The solution requires disaster recovery and the chosen
technology for providing DR of services in this organisation is Veritas
Cluster Server.
Has anyone implemented ZFS with
The last two faults shown by `fmdump' are:
TIME UUID SUNW-MSG-ID
...
Apr 27 18:51:52.7736 0c4bc0d7-59ff-6707-b306-8458c0e1626f SUNOS-8000-1L
May 02 16:09:04.4966 e6c41816-5505-c31f-f9da-d81cdac50e21 ZFS-8000-CS
We had an incident in May
Razvan Corneliu VILT wrote:
Sounds like the right solution to my problem in it solves a few problems, but
I am rather curious about how it would integrate with a potential Samba
server running on the same system (in case someone needs a domain controller
as well as a fileserver).
1 -
Yes, it should be safe to do so.
- Eric
On Sun, Nov 04, 2007 at 08:21:26AM -0600, Gary Mills wrote:
The last two faults shown by `fmdump' are:
TIME UUID SUNW-MSG-ID
...
Apr 27 18:51:52.7736 0c4bc0d7-59ff-6707-b306-8458c0e1626f
Does anyone know whether the following (copied from Wikipedia) is true or not??
Solaris has a project called CIFS client for Solaris, based on the
Mac OS X smbfs.
Rayson
On Nov 4, 2007 9:34 AM, Mark Shellenbaum [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Razvan Corneliu VILT wrote:
Sounds like the right
Rayson Ho wrote:
Does anyone know whether the following (copied from Wikipedia) is true or
not??
Solaris has a project called CIFS client for Solaris, based on the
Mac OS X smbfs.
Rayson
Yes, that is true.
http://www.opensolaris.org/os/project/smbfs/
-Mark
On Nov 4, 2007, at 00:42, MC wrote:
ZFS has a smb server on the way, but there has been no real public
information about it released. Here is a sample of its existence:
http://www.opensolaris.org/os/community/arc/caselog/
2007/560/;jsessionid=F4061C9308088852992B7DE83CD9C1A3
There's
On 10/16/07, Dave Johnson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
does anyone actually *use* compression ? i'd like to see a poll on how many
people are using (or would use) compression on production systems that are
larger than your little department catch-all dumping ground server.
We don't use
Having gotten a bit tired of the level of ZFS hype floating around these days
(especially that which Jonathan has chosen to associate with his spin
surrounding the fracas with NetApp), I chose to respond to that article
yesterday. I did attempt to be fair and would appreciate feedback if
See maybe
http://mail.opensolaris.org/pipermail/zfs-discuss/2007-April/039419.html
cheers
/d
2007/11/4, Nathan Dietsch [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Hello All,
I am working with a customer on a solution where ZFS looks very
promising. The solution requires disaster recovery and the chosen
technology
13 matches
Mail list logo
