Lida Horn Sun.COM> writes:
>
> I think you jumped to a conclusion that is probably not warranted.
You are right. I read his error message too hastily and thought I
recognized a pattern --I have been victim of bug 6587133 myself.
And to top this off I gave him the wrong patch number.
To answer P
On Thu, Mar 06, 2008 at 10:34:07PM -0800, Bill Shannon wrote:
> Darren J Moffat wrote:
> > I know this isn't answering the question but rather than using "today"
> > and "yesterday" why not not just use dates ?
>
> Because then I have to compute yesterday's date to do the incremental
> dump.
Not
Hi Lori,
Do you happen to know any update on Live Update zfs support?
Thanks,
Ivan.
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
Marc Bevand wrote:
> Paul Raines nmr.mgh.harvard.edu> writes:
>
>> Mar 9 03:22:16 raidsrv03 sata: NOTICE:
>> /pci 0,0/pci1022,7458 1/pci11ab,11ab 1:
>> Mar 9 03:22:16 raidsrv03 port 6: device reset
>> [...]
>>
>> The above repeated a few times but now seems to have stopped.
>> Running 'h
Paul Raines wrote:
> On Sun, 9 Mar 2008, Marc Bevand wrote:
>
>
>> Paul Raines nmr.mgh.harvard.edu> writes:
>>
>>> Mar 9 03:22:16 raidsrv03 sata: NOTICE:
>>> /pci 0,0/pci1022,7458 1/pci11ab,11ab 1:
>>> Mar 9 03:22:16 raidsrv03 port 6: device reset
>>> [...]
>>>
>>> The above repeated
On Sun, 9 Mar 2008, Marc Bevand wrote:
> Paul Raines nmr.mgh.harvard.edu> writes:
>>
>> Mar 9 03:22:16 raidsrv03 sata: NOTICE:
>> /pci 0,0/pci1022,7458 1/pci11ab,11ab 1:
>> Mar 9 03:22:16 raidsrv03 port 6: device reset
>> [...]
>>
>> The above repeated a few times but now seems to have stop
On Mon, 10 Mar 2008, Lida Horn wrote:
> Paul Raines wrote:
>> Well, I ran updatemanager and started applying about 64 updates. After
>> the progress meter got about half way it seemed to hang not moving for
>> hours. I finally gave up and did a reboot. But the machine would not
>> reboot. I we
Paul Raines wrote:
> Well, I ran updatemanager and started applying about 64 updates. After
> the progress meter got about half way it seemed to hang not moving for
> hours. I finally gave up and did a reboot. But the machine would not
> reboot. I went in the ILOM and tried 'stop /SYS' but afte
Mario Goebbels wrote:
I just purchased a new laptop and would like to set it up to boot from
ZFS. I read in newsgroups that it was predicted to be included into
b83, but this apparently didn't happen. Is there any prediction when
this may be available?
>>> If you
>So, every next day, I see how much data changed since the day before, but I
>can't see this info when more than one snapshot gets executed.
>
>Hope this clarifies my issue a little bit.
I understand, but i don't think the accounting is meant to be that way;
it's more or less "if you remove thi
>>> I just purchased a new laptop and would like to set it up to boot from
>>> ZFS. I read in newsgroups that it was predicted to be included into
>>> b83, but this apparently didn't happen. Is there any prediction when
>>> this may be available?
>>
>> If you install OpenSolaris Developer Preview
>Here his zfs list on that filesystem
>
>---8<-
># zfs list
>NAME USED AVAIL REFER
>MOUNT
>POINT
>nas262G 879G 11,2G /nas
>nas/nwserv
Hi,
I'm using Tim Foster's zfs automatic snapshot to keep copies of a zfs
filesystem.
I keep 30 days, seven weeks and 12 months, these snapshots get created at 00:00
every day and when a new week starts (or a new month) there are two or three
snapshots that start at the same time.
Using zfs l
2008/3/10, Darren J Moffat <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> Paul Gress wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I just purchased a new laptop and would like to set it up to boot from
> > ZFS. I read in newsgroups that it was predicted to be included into
> > b83, but this apparently didn't happen. Is there any prediction
Paul Gress wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I just purchased a new laptop and would like to set it up to boot from
> ZFS. I read in newsgroups that it was predicted to be included into
> b83, but this apparently didn't happen. Is there any prediction when
> this may be available?
If you install OpenSolaris
Bob,
Are you sure that /pandora is mounted?
I hazard a guess that the error message is caused by mounting
zpool:pandora when /pandora is not empty. I notice that snv81 started
mounting zfs in level-order whereas my snv73 did not.
On Sun, Mar 9, 2008 at 10:16 AM, Bob Netherton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
16 matches
Mail list logo
