On Thu, Mar 06, 2008 at 10:34:07PM -0800, Bill Shannon wrote:
Darren J Moffat wrote:
I know this isn't answering the question but rather than using today
and yesterday why not not just use dates ?
Because then I have to compute yesterday's date to do the incremental
dump.
Not if you set
Lida Horn Lida.Horn at Sun.COM writes:
I think you jumped to a conclusion that is probably not warranted.
You are right. I read his error message too hastily and thought I
recognized a pattern --I have been victim of bug 6587133 myself.
And to top this off I gave him the wrong patch number.
Do *NOT* install 127871-02 on a Solaris 10 system.
127871-02 is an immature Feature patch associated with Solaris 10 Update 5.
It's only purpose is for constructing pre-release builds of Solaris 10 Update
5 for internal Sun testing. It is *not* to be installed on pre-U5 systems.
127871-02
kevin kramer wrote:
client CentOS 5.1 latest kernel
mount option for zfs filesystem =
rw,nosuid,nodev,remount,noatime,nfsvers=3,udp,intr,bg
,hard,rsize=8192,wsize=8192
directory and parent owned by user and users GID, 775
on client touch
Kevin Kramer wrote:
no. I'm running on a Dell 1950. I'm updating the system now. Do my
aclmode,aclinherit look right? I've read the guide and think this is my
best option.
thanks.
the ACL properties have no bearing on this. The issue is that you are
using an NFSv3 client and its asking
On Mon, 10 Mar 2008, Ivan Wang wrote:
Hi Lori,
Do you happen to know any update on Live Update zfs
support?
You mean Live Upgrade? It's being worked on as we
speak to make it
zfs-aware. It should be available at the same time
the zfs-aware
installer is made available.
Yeah,
Kevin Kramer wrote:
client is CentOS 5.1
server is running Sol10
You should look into applying the patch I mentioned earlier on your S10
server.
-Mark
Is your ZFS file system on an S10 system?
You are most likely seeing this bug.
6528189 cp -p invalid argument issue
I recently added a new disk to a workstation that just had one disk which was
being used as the boot disk with a large partition being used as a zpool. I
added a new disk to this system and created a new pool comprised of only the
new disk in order to migrate all the data on the original zfs
On Tue, 11 Mar 2008, Haik Aftandilian wrote:
Or is there a way to manually set the creator of a fileystem?
Not knowing any better I used a simple 'chown owner:group' syntax. :-)
You could also use 'cpio -p' to transfer directory ownership based on
the original master.
Bob
On Tue, 11 Mar 2008, Haik Aftandilian wrote:
Or is there a way to manually set the creator of a
fileystem?
Not knowing any better I used a simple 'chown
owner:group' syntax. :-)
I didn't think of that :) But, I just tried it (changing the ownership of the
mountpoint) and it did not
I'm using the latest build of opensolaris express available from
opensolaris.org.
I had no problems with the install (its an AMD64 x2 3800+, 1gb
physical ram, 1 ide drive for the os and 4*250GB sata drives attached
to the motherboard - nforce based chipset).
I create a zfs pool on the 4 sata
Frank Bottone wrote:
I'm using the latest build of opensolaris express available from
opensolaris.org.
I had no problems with the install (its an AMD64 x2 3800+, 1gb
physical ram, 1 ide drive for the os and 4*250GB sata drives attached
to the motherboard - nforce based chipset).
If you
Frank Bottone wrote:
I'm using the latest build of opensolaris express available from
opensolaris.org.
I had no problems with the install (its an AMD64 x2 3800+, 1gb
physical ram, 1 ide drive for the os and 4*250GB sata drives attached
to the motherboard - nforce based chipset).
I create
On Mar 11, 2008, at 4:58 PM, Bart Smaalders wrote:
Frank Bottone wrote:
I'm using the latest build of opensolaris express available from
opensolaris.org.
I had no problems with the install (its an AMD64 x2 3800+, 1gb
physical ram, 1 ide drive for the os and 4*250GB sata drives attached
to
I checked for the bios updates - there are none (its just a consumer
grade system). I will try disabling the drives in the bios - I did not
realize that Solaris would still see the drives with that set. That
would be the simplest method!
If not, I will try to partition and give a full slice to
15 matches
Mail list logo
