Richard Elling wrote:
Orvar Korvar wrote:
Ok, thanx for your answers!
So, I guess there is no point in providing a database on top of ZFS, just as
MS tried to do? A WinFS like thing on ZFS wouldnt be beneficial at all?
Better off with plain ZFS?
I don't think this is a simple
Ok, here is lot of info and input. Thanx for sharing!
I wonder, would it be possible for SUN to come up with a WinFS similar thing
upon ZFS? A killer app for ZFS, making everyone wanting ZFS (everyone wants it
already, but more is more)?
I would like to see SUN did a database thingy a la
Hi everyone,
I am not exactly sure if this is ZFS problem or Java or something else?
On a T2000 with latest patch 120011-14, we are not able to kill a Java process,
e.g. kill or kill -9 has no affect on the process. I did a lsof on the PID and
saw over 200 open files and many are showing the
Hi everyone,
I am not exactly sure if this is ZFS problem or Java or something else?
On a T2000 with latest patch 120011-14, we are not able to kill a Java
process, e.g. kill or kill
-9 has no affect on the process. I did a lsof on the PID and saw over 200 open
files and many are s
howing the
Why would you build a complex database filesystem for searching through some
pictures and word documents, or movies and songs? The answer is: you
wouldn't. You'd do what everyone is already doing: provide a user app that
indexes important files and lets you search them. Problem solved.
Thanks for your reply,
Before I used lsof, I tried pstack and truss -p but I get the following message:
# pstack 22861
pstack: cannot examine 22861: unanticipated system error
# truss -p 22861
truss: unanticipated system error: 22861
# pstack -F 22861
pstack: cannot examine 22861: unanticipated
You are looking for mdb.
echo '0t22861::pid2proc |::walk thread |::findstack' | mdb -k
On Tue, Mar 18, 2008 at 11:28 PM, Vahid Moghaddasi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thanks for your reply,
Before I used lsof, I tried pstack and truss -p but I get the following
message:
# pstack 22861
You are looking for mdb.
echo '0t22861::pid2proc |::walk thread |::findstack'
| mdb -k
There are over 120 threads in the very long output, I will post some sections
of the output here but they are mostly look alike, what can I do with this
information, is there a way to kill 22861 at all?
On Tue, 18 Mar 2008, Orvar Korvar wrote:
Just as ZFS makes NTFS look like crap, I would like SUN to make
something that makes WinFS look like crap! :o) Would it be possible
to utilize the unique functions ZFS has, to revolutionize again?
What possible advantages could ZFS provide for the
On Mar 17, 2008, at 6:21 AM, Mertol Ozyoney wrote:
Hi All ;
I am not a Solaris or ZFS expert and I am in need of your help.
When I run the following command
zfs send –i [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] | ssh 10.10.103.42 zfs
receive –F data/data41
if some one is accessing
WinFS sort of addresses the CAS needs of the home user Market. Sun is already
working on the Enterprise CAS needs with Honeycomb (5800) programmable storage
array. I believe they are moving the code base to ZFS. The database it uses
for it's metadata and programmable schemas came out of a
Friends,
I have recently built a file server on x2200 with solaris x86 having zfs
(version4) and running NFS version2 samba.
the AIX 5.2 AIX 5.2 client give error while running command cp -R
zfs_nfs_mount_source zfs_nfs_mount_desticantion as below:
cp: 0653-440 directory/1: name too long.
cp:
Sachin Palav wrote:
Friends,
I have recently built a file server on x2200 with solaris x86 having zfs
(version4) and running NFS version2 samba.
the AIX 5.2 AIX 5.2 client give error while running command cp -R
zfs_nfs_mount_source zfs_nfs_mount_desticantion as below:
cp: 0653-440
Michael Schuster wrote:
Sachin Palav wrote:
Friends,
I have recently built a file server on x2200 with solaris x86 having zfs
(version4) and running NFS version2 samba.
the AIX 5.2 AIX 5.2 client give error while running command cp -R
zfs_nfs_mount_source zfs_nfs_mount_desticantion
I know nothing of AIX, but as a guess out of air:
Since it's a recursive copy, is it possible one of the filenames in the the
tree is just really long or the directory structures are so deep that it passes
some AIX limit?
This message posted from opensolaris.org
1. In zfs can you currently add more disks to an existing raidz?
This is important to me as i slowly add disks to my system one at a
time.
No
Is this being worked on? Is it even planned? (I've looked at a bunch of
FAQs and searched some mailing lists but I can't find the answers so I
ask
Sachin Palav wrote:
Friends,
I have recently built a file server on x2200 with solaris x86 having zfs
(version4) and running NFS version2 samba.
the AIX 5.2 AIX 5.2 client give error while running command cp -R
zfs_nfs_mount_source zfs_nfs_mount_desticantion as below:
cp: 0653-440
17 matches
Mail list logo
