I'm no expert, but the first thing I'd ask is whether you could repeat that
test without using compression? I'd be quite worried about how a system is
going to perform when it's basically running off a 50GB compressed file.
There seem to be a lot of variables here, on quite a few new systems,
Keep in mind that if you use ZFS you get a lot of additional functionality like
snapshots, compression, clones.
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
I can see a number of closed bugs, and some discussion on this, but I can't
find if there's any outstanding bug for it. Can anybody find one, or should I
create a new bug?
In snv_103 I've seen resilvers restarting several times. I have been running
zpool status as root, but most of the time
Ethan Erchinger wrote:
Hi all,
First, I'll say my intent is not to spam a bunch of lists, but after
posting to opensolaris-discuss I had someone communicate with me offline
that these lists would possibly be a better place to start. So here we
are. For those on all three lists, sorry for
Richard Elling wrote:
I've seen these symptoms when a large number of errors were reported
in a short period of time and memory was low. What does fmdump -eV
show?
fmdump -eV shows lots of messages like this, and yea, I believe that to
be sd16 which is the SSD:
Dec 03 2008
Ross wrote:
I'm no expert, but the first thing I'd ask is whether you could repeat that
test without using compression? I'd be quite worried about how a system is
going to perform when it's basically running off a 50GB compressed file.
Yes this does occur with compression off, but
On Thu, Dec 4, 2008 at 11:55 AM, Ethan Erchinger [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ross wrote:
I'm no expert, but the first thing I'd ask is whether you could repeat
that test without using compression? I'd be quite worried about how a
system is going to perform when it's basically running off a
Tim wrote:
Are you leaving ANY ram for zfs to do it's thing? If you're consuming
ALL system memory for just this file/application, I would expect the
system to fall over and die.
Hmm. I believe that the kernel should manage that relationship for me.
If the system cannot manage swap or
Ethan Erchinger wrote:
Richard Elling wrote:
I've seen these symptoms when a large number of errors were reported
in a short period of time and memory was low. What does fmdump -eV
show?
fmdump -eV shows lots of messages like this, and yea, I believe that
to be sd16 which is the SSD:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
I think we found the choke point. The silver lining is that it isn't the
T2000 or ZFS. We think it is the new SAN, an Hitachi AMS1000, which has
7200RPM SATA disks with the cache turned off. This system has a very small
cache, and when we did turn it on for one of
Has anyone seen files created on a linux client with negative or zero
creation timestamps on zfs+nfs exported datasets?
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
Yes, I've seen them on nfs filesystems on solaris10 using a Netapp nfs
server.
Here's a link to a solution that I just implemented on a solaris10
server:
https://equoria.net/index.php/Value_too_large_for_defined_data_type
On Thu, 2008-12-04 at 15:31, Scott Williamson wrote:
Has anyone seen files
As a result of a power spike during a thunder storm I lost a sata controller
card. This card supported my zfs pool called newsan which is a 4 x samsung 1Tb
sata2 disk raid-z. I replaced the card and the devices have the same
controller/disk numbers, but now have the following issue.
Richard Elling wrote:
asc = 0x29
ascq = 0x0
ASC/ASCQ 29/00 is POWER ON, RESET, OR BUS DEVICE RESET OCCURRED
http://www.t10.org/lists/asc-num.htm#ASC_29
[this should be more descriptive as the codes are, more-or-less,
standardized, I'll try to file an RFE, unless someone
On Thu, Dec 4, 2008 at 4:52 PM, Ed Spencer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Yes, I've seen them on nfs filesystems on solaris10 using a Netapp nfs
server.
Here's a link to a solution that I just implemented on a solaris10
server:
https://equoria.net/index.php/Value_too_large_for_defined_data_type
I
Thanks for the tips. I'm not sure if they will be relevant, though. We don't
talk directly with the AMS1000. We are using a USP-VM to virtualize all of our
storage and we didn't have to add anything to the drv configuration files to
see the new disk (mpxio was already turned on). We are
Can you send the output of the attached D script when running 'zpool
status'?
- Eric
On Thu, Dec 04, 2008 at 02:58:54PM -0800, Brett wrote:
As a result of a power spike during a thunder storm I lost a sata controller
card. This card supported my zfs pool called newsan which is a 4 x samsung
any suggestions? I would like to restore redundancy ASAP
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
18 matches
Mail list logo
