[zfs-discuss] zfs on 32 bit?

2009-06-14 Thread roland
Hello, the ZFS best practices guide at http://www.solarisinternals.com/wiki/index.php/ZFS_Best_Practices_Guide tells: * Run ZFS on a system that runs a 64-bit kernel besides performance aspects, what`s the con`s of running zfs on 32 bit ? -- This message posted from opensolaris.org

Re: [zfs-discuss] eon or nexentacore or opensolaris

2009-06-14 Thread Andre Lue
Js.lists, My needs are: * Easy package management There is no pkgadd or ips included in EON. You can however add IPS and retrieve any of its available packages. * Easy upgrades EON is fairly easy to upgrade and the risk is low. All you have to do is preserve your previous image before

Re: [zfs-discuss] zfs on 32 bit?

2009-06-14 Thread Jürgen Keil
besides performance aspects, what`s the con`s of running zfs on 32 bit ? The default 32 bit kernel can cache a limited amount of data ( 512MB) - unless you lower the kernelbase parameter. In the end the small cache size on 32 bit explains the inferior performance compared to the 64 bit kernel.

Re: [zfs-discuss] zfs on 32 bit?

2009-06-14 Thread Erik Trimble
Jürgen Keil wrote: besides performance aspects, what`s the con`s of running zfs on 32 bit ? The default 32 bit kernel can cache a limited amount of data ( 512MB) - unless you lower the kernelbase parameter. In the end the small cache size on 32 bit explains the inferior performance

Re: [zfs-discuss] zfs on 32 bit?

2009-06-14 Thread James Litchfield
There is a 32-bit and 64-bit version of the file system module available on x86. Given the quality of the development team, I'd be *very* surprised if such issues as suggested in your message exist. Jurgen's comment highlights the major issue - the lack of space to cache data when in 32-bit

Re: [zfs-discuss] zfs on 32 bit?

2009-06-14 Thread Daniel Carosone
This sounds like FUD. There's a comprehensive test suite, and it apparently passes. -- This message posted from opensolaris.org ___ zfs-discuss mailing list zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss

Re: [zfs-discuss] zfs on 32 bit?

2009-06-14 Thread Carson Gaspar
Daniel Carosone wrote: This sounds like FUD. There's a comprehensive test suite, and it apparently passes. It's not exactly FUD. If you search the list archives, you'll find messages about multiple bugs in the 32-bit code. I strongly suspect that these have been fixed in the interim, but it

[zfs-discuss] zfs list -t snapshots

2009-06-14 Thread Harry Putnam
I've been very inactive on opensolaris for a while and have forgotten a discouraging amount of what little I knew. I want to get back using the snapshot capability of zfs and am having a time figuring out how to use zfs list -t snapshot. man zfs shows: zfs list [-rH] [-o property[,...]] [-t

Re: [zfs-discuss] eon or nexentacore or opensolaris

2009-06-14 Thread Bogdan M. Maryniuk
On Mon, Jun 15, 2009 at 5:50 AM, Andre Lueno-re...@opensolaris.org wrote: Feel free to give EON a twirl. It will only cost you CD and the time to burn and boot it. Or if you have a VM you can test it there. You'll know reallly fast if it has enough of a framework for you to add the missing

Re: [zfs-discuss] eon or nexentacore or opensolaris

2009-06-14 Thread Andre Lue
Hi Bogdan, I'd recommend the following RAM minimums for a fair balance of performance. 700Mb 32-bit 1Gb 64-bit -- This message posted from opensolaris.org ___ zfs-discuss mailing list zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org