On Aug 14, 2009, at 2:31 PM, "Joseph L. Casale" > wrote:
I have setup a pool called vmstorage and mounted it as nfs storage
in esx4i.
The pool in freenas contains 4 sata2 disks in raidz. I have 6 vms;
5 linux and 1 windows and performance is terrible.
Any suggestion on improving the perfor
On 14-Aug-09, at 11:14 AM, Peter Schow wrote:
On Thu, Aug 13, 2009 at 05:02:46PM -0600, Louis-Fr?d?ric Feuillette
wrote:
I saw this question on another mailing list, and I too would like to
know. And I have a couple questions of my own.
== Paraphrased from other list ==
Does anyone have any
On Aug 14, 2009, at 7:15 AM, Alex Lam S.L. wrote:
Thanks for the informative analysis!
Just wondering - are there better candidates out there than even LZO
for this purpose?
tamp is perhaps another interesting candidate. But Tim is in a better
position to say where it is heading.
http://blogs
On Fri, Aug 14, 2009 at 13:35, Alex Lam S.L. wrote:
> Hi there,
>
> I have a raid-z(1) data pool with "smb=name=data" (4x750GB local SATA
> II), which I open up for my Windows machines to dump files into.
>
> Trouble is, the SMB share would disappear from the network at least
> once a day, and when
>I have setup a pool called vmstorage and mounted it as nfs storage in esx4i.
>The pool in freenas contains 4 sata2 disks in raidz. I have 6 vms; 5 linux
>and 1 windows and performance is terrible.
>
>Any suggestion on improving the performance of the current setup.
>
>I have added the following
Hi there,
I have a raid-z(1) data pool with "smb=name=data" (4x750GB local SATA
II), which I open up for my Windows machines to dump files into.
Trouble is, the SMB share would disappear from the network at least
once a day, and when it happens, I have to reboot OpenSolaris
(2009.06) in order to
On Aug 14, 2009, at 9:19 AM, Matthew Stevenson wrote:
Please can someone take a look at the attached file which shows the
output on my machine of
zfs list -r -t filesystem,snapshot -o space rpool/export/home/matt
The USEDDS figure of ~2GB is what I would expect, and is the same
figure repo
Hello!
I have a clean installation of Solaris Express Community Edition Build 119.
I created a zpool consisting of a mirror of two iSCSI disks. The new pool is
empty - no files or filesystems yet.
After some time I might have lost the connection to the iSCSI devices resulting
in a crashed pool.
Please can someone take a look at the attached file which shows the output on
my machine of
zfs list -r -t filesystem,snapshot -o space rpool/export/home/matt
The USEDDS figure of ~2GB is what I would expect, and is the same figure
reported by the Disk Usage Analyzer. Where is the remaining 13.8
The only problem I see, is data set size. Let me explain (and please correct
if I'm wrong).
ZFS basically compresses 2 things -- metadata and data. And data is at most
128k chunk.
Each chunk is individually compressed, not the whole file.
This should affect dictionary size for the lzo compre
On Thu, Aug 13, 2009 at 05:02:46PM -0600, Louis-Fr?d?ric Feuillette wrote:
> I saw this question on another mailing list, and I too would like to
> know. And I have a couple questions of my own.
>
> == Paraphrased from other list ==
> Does anyone have any recommendations for books on File Systems
I did see this, Thanks.
On Fri, 2009-08-14 at 10:51 -0400, Christine Tran wrote:
>
>
> 2009/8/14 Louis-Frédéric Feuillette
>
>
> I am primarily interested in the theory of how to write a
> filesystem.
> The kernel interface comes later when I dive into
Hi,
I've encountered this bug:
http://www.opensolaris.org/jive/thread.jspa?threadID=108316&tstart=30
and to obviate to the problem I'm using legacy mounts.
Now the system boot without problems, but nfs server doesn't start because
couldn't find any share.
So I've disabled nfs with zfs set sharenf
Just to answer my own question - this one might be interesting:
http://www.quicklz.com/
Alex.
On Fri, Aug 14, 2009 at 3:15 PM, Alex Lam S.L. wrote:
> Thanks for the informative analysis!
>
> Just wondering - are there better candidates out there than even LZO
> for this purpose?
>
> Alex.
>
>
>
On Fri, 2009-08-14 at 12:34 +0200, Joerg Schilling wrote:
> Louis-Frédéric Feuillette wrote:
>
> > I saw this question on another mailing list, and I too would like to
> > know. And I have a couple questions of my own.
> >
> > == Paraphrased from other list ==
> > Does anyone have any recommendat
Thanks for the informative analysis!
Just wondering - are there better candidates out there than even LZO
for this purpose?
Alex.
On Fri, Aug 14, 2009 at 8:05 AM, Denis Ahrens wrote:
> Hi
>
> Some developers here said a long time ago that someone should show
> the code for LZO compression suppo
Yup, that one was down to a known (and fixed) bug though, so it isn't the
normal story of ZFS problems.
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs
On Fri, August 14, 2009 09:02, Tom Bird wrote:
> I can't remember how many errors the check found, however all the data
> copied off successfully, as far as we know.
I would think that you'd be fairly confident of the integrity of the data
since everything would be checksummed.
Joyent also had a
Victor Latushkin wrote:
This issue (and previous one reported by Tom) has got some publicity
recently - see here
http://www.uknof.org.uk/uknof13/Bird-Redux.pdf
So i feel like i need to provide a little bit more information about the
outcome (sorry that it is delayed and not as full as previo
I have setup a pool called vmstorage and mounted it as nfs storage in esx4i.
The pool in freenas contains 4 sata2 disks in raidz. I have 6 vms; 5 linux
and 1 windows and performance is terrible.
Any suggestion on improving the performance of the current setup.
I have added the following vfs.zfs.
Louis-Frédéric Feuillette wrote:
> I saw this question on another mailing list, and I too would like to
> know. And I have a couple questions of my own.
>
> == Paraphrased from other list ==
> Does anyone have any recommendations for books on File Systems and/or
> File Systems Programming?
> == e
On Fri, Aug 14, 2009 at 2:05 PM, Denis Ahrens wrote:
> Some developers here said a long time ago that someone should show
> the code for LZO compression support for ZFS before talking about the
> next step.
Isn't the main problem license, LZO being GPL, while zfs CDDL?
--
Fajar
_
Great read.
On Fri, Aug 14, 2009 at 3:05 AM, Denis Ahrens wrote:
> Hi
>
> Some developers here said a long time ago that someone should show
> the code for LZO compression support for ZFS before talking about the
> next step. I made that code with a friend and we also made a little
> benchmark to
Hi
Some developers here said a long time ago that someone should show
the code for LZO compression support for ZFS before talking about the
next step. I made that code with a friend and we also made a little
benchmark to give a first impression:
http://denisy.dyndns.org/lzo_vs_lzjb/
I hope we ma
24 matches
Mail list logo