Good Evening,
Thanks for your fast reply Gary. I think I didn't get the point in the right
way so heres the second try :-)
On Tue, Nov 03, 2009 at 11:39:28AM -0800, Ralf
Teckelmann wrote:
Hi and hello,
I have a problem confusing me. I hope someone can
help me with it.
I followed a
Orvar Korvar wrote:
Does this putback mean that I have to upgrade my zpool, or is it a zfs tool? If
I missed upgrading my zpool I am smoked?
The putback did not bump zpool or zfs versions. You shouldn't have to upgrade
your pool.
-tim
___
pbh == Paul B Henson hen...@acm.org writes:
pbh I've got a cron job running every hour on the backend servers
pbh crawling around and fixing permissions on new directories :(.
To my view, if there's a problem it's first with the build system,
second with NFS. You can fix Solaris to do
Hey
Thanks for the slides but some things are still unclear.
Slide 18 shows variably sizes extents but doesn't explain the process of
full-on write. What I'm looking for is one example. I still don't understand
how it works with variable sized extents. So if you have 2 stripe units on one
csb == Craig S Bell cb...@standard.com writes:
csb Two: If you lost data with another filesystem, you may have
csb overlooked it and blamed the OS or the application,
yeah, but with ZFS you often lose the whole pool in certain classes of
repeatable real-world failures, like hotswap disks
rm == Robert Milkowski mi...@task.gda.pl writes:
rm Personally I don't blame Sun that implementing the CR took so
rm long as it mostly affected home users with cheap hardware from
rm BestBuy like sources
no, many of the reports were FC SAN's.
rm and even then it was relatively
Hi,
Am I right to assume ZFS currently doesn't support the least privilege model ?
I'm trying to make bacula run as non root on zfs and be able to restore
files a non-root with the correct least privilege modes but when I
enable debugging with ppriv -D pid I get
Nov 5 20:39:27 corona genunix:
rn == Roman Naumenko ro...@frontline.ca writes:
rn The total space occupied by snapshots from the second print is
rn far less than reported in the first (usedbysnapshots 161G)
It will take me too much thinking to untangle this sentence, but maybe
you can untangle mine:
The space
Miles Nordin wrote:
csb == Craig S Bell cb...@standard.com writes:
csb Two: If you lost data with another filesystem, you may have
csb overlooked it and blamed the OS or the application,
yeah, but with ZFS you often lose the whole pool in certain classes of
repeatable real-world failures,
Miles Nordin wrote:
rm == Robert Milkowski mi...@task.gda.pl writes:
rm Personally I don't blame Sun that implementing the CR took so
rm long as it mostly affected home users with cheap hardware from
rm BestBuy like sources
no, many of the reports were FC SAN's.
I think I finally see what you mean.
# luactivate b126
System has findroot enabled GRUB
ERROR: Unable to determine the configuration of the current boot environment
b125.
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
Hi Robert
I think you mean snv_128 not 126 :-)
6667683 need a way to rollback to an uberblock from a previous txg
http://bugs.opensolaris.org/view_bug.do?bug_id=6667683
http://hg.genunix.org/onnv-gate.hg/rev/8aac17999e4d
Regards
Nigel Smith
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
Robert Milkowski wrote:
Miles Nordin wrote:
csb == Craig S Bell cb...@standard.com writes:
csb Two: If you lost data with another filesystem, you may have
csb overlooked it and blamed the OS or the application,
yeah, but with ZFS you often lose the whole pool in certain
classes of
hi folks,
i'm seeing an odd problem wondered whether others had encountered it.
when i try to write to a nevada NFS share from a mac os X (10.5) client via the
mac's GUI, i get a permissions error - the file is 0 bytes, date set to jan 1,
1970, and perms set to 000. writing to the share via
On Thu, 5 Nov 2009, Chris Du wrote:
I think I finally see what you mean.
# luactivate b126
System has findroot enabled GRUB
ERROR: Unable to determine the configuration of the current boot environment
b125.
Hmm. Does this mean that lupgrading from b121 to b126 will also fail,
or is the
On Thu, Nov 05, 2009 at 01:01:54PM -0800, Chris Du wrote:
I think I finally see what you mean.
# luactivate b126
System has findroot enabled GRUB
ERROR: Unable to determine the configuration of the current boot environment
b125.
A possible solution was posted in the thread:
Hi Rich,
In build 125, the device naming changed for redundant pools.
LU doesn't understand the new device naming if you have a mirrored root pool.
I believe an upgrade from 121 to 126 will be okay. Any LU operation on
your build 126 system will likely fail unless you follow Casper's steps
for
Hi All,
Has anyone seen problems with the arc cache holding on to memory in
memory pressure conditions?
We have several Oracle DB servers running zfs for the root file
systems and the databases on vxfs.
An unexpected number of clients connected and cause a memory shortage
such that some
On Thu, 5 Nov 2009, Miles Nordin wrote:
allowing the first local patch into your site? or you are running a
closed-source release where you have to roll over and beg for support?
We're running Solaris 10. It does seem like I spend an undue amount of time
lately dealing with Sun support, I have
So then of what use is the parity?
And how is the metadata used to reconstruct bad data? I understand obviously
what the metadata contains but I don't get how ZFS traverses through a file
system and USES the metadata to construct bad blocks.
I understand that you write everything to separate
Hi Gary
I will let 'website-discuss' know about this problem.
They normally fix issues like that.
Those pages always seemed to just update automatically.
I guess it's related to the website transition.
Thanks
Nigel Smith
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
Thanks for taking the time to write this - very useful info :)
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
Ok, since we're doing weird, here's my experience ...
MacOS X 10.5, amd64 snv_82, ZFS via NFS v3, iTunes 7-ish
One ZFS filesystem with about 8000 mp3 files.
One empty iTunes library.
Drag and drop about 250 directories (containing the 800 files) into
iTunes from NFS mounted volume.
Select
On Thu, Nov 05, 2009 at 03:39:56PM -0800, Rich Teer wrote:
On Thu, 5 Nov 2009, Chris Du wrote:
I think I finally see what you mean.
# luactivate b126
System has findroot enabled GRUB
ERROR: Unable to determine the configuration of the current boot
environment b125.
Hmm. Does
I just finished the upgrade.
detach one disk from the mirror, then luactivate b126 and init 6, after it
reboots, attach the disk to the mirror again, all went smoothly.
Thanks a lot.
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
zfs-discuss mailing
25 matches
Mail list logo
