On Tue, Feb 9 at 2:36, Kjetil Torgrim Homme wrote:
Daniel Carosone writes:
In that context, I haven't seen an answer, just a conclusion:
- All else is not equal, so I give my money to some other hardware
manufacturer, and get frustrated that Sun "won't let me" buy the
parts I could u
amber ~ # zpool list data
NAME SIZE ALLOC FREECAP DEDUP HEALTH ALTROOT
data 930G 295G 635G31% 1.00x ONLINE -
amber ~ # zfs send -RD d...@prededup |zfs recv -d ezdata
cannot receive new filesystem stream: destination 'ezdata' exists
must specify -F to overwrite it
amber ~
Have you considered Promise JBODs? They officially support
bring-your-own-drives.
Wes Felter
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
On Tue, Feb 9, 2010 at 7:37 PM, Frank Cusack
wrote:
>
> I assume you are responding to my comment and not Toby's. Did you try
> to drill down past the front page? To look at the specs for ANY server?
> I just thought it was much more difficult to look at and compare specs
> than it was on Sun's
I was having a conversation a few weeks ago about the various possible ways
of handling a chmod() on a file/directory with an acl. I suggested that one
option be for it just be ignored, as the file presumably had that acl for a
reason and the creator probably doesn't want it indiscriminitely whack
On Tue, 9 Feb 2010, Frank Cusack wrote:
I assume you are responding to my comment and not Toby's. Did you try
to drill down past the front page? To look at the specs for ANY server?
I just thought it was much more difficult to look at and compare specs
than it was on Sun's site. Turns out you
On 2/9/10 5:19 PM -0600 Tim Cook wrote:
On Tue, Feb 9, 2010 at 2:39 PM, Toby Thain
wrote:
On 9-Feb-10, at 2:02 PM, Frank Cusack wrote:
On 2/9/10 12:03 PM +1100 Daniel Carosone wrote:>
Snorcle wants to sell hardware.
LOL ... snorcle
But apparently they don't. Have you seen the new we
Thanks for the archive pointer, I completely overlooked it.
Replacing the obfuscated 'at's allows mutt to read them :)
Doing some other lint checks... these lines in the gzip archives
could be adjusted by the list maintainer if so desired:
# Could be missing ' at ohsu.edu'
2006-May.txt.gz:From hak
Am 09.02.10 09:58, schrieb Felix Buenemann:
Am 09.02.10 02:30, schrieb Bob Friesenhahn:
On Tue, 9 Feb 2010, Felix Buenemann wrote:
Well to make things short: Using JBOD + ZFS Striped Mirrors vs.
controller's RAID10, dropped the max. sequential read I/O from over
400 MByte/s to below 300 MByte/
> Since I started this, let me explain to those who can't begin to understand
> why I proposed something so "stupid". At work (branch of a federal gov't
> big-5 Department) I need 40TB but have next to nothing in budget. (For some
> reason all you damn citizens think you're entitled to keep most of
Neil Perrin writes:
> On 02/09/10 08:18, Kjetil Torgrim Homme wrote:
>> I think the above is easily misunderstood. I assume the OP means
>> append, not rewrites, and in that case (with recordsize=128k):
>>
>> * after the first write, the file will consist of a single 1 KiB record.
>> * after the
On Tue, 9 Feb 2010, Daniel Bakken wrote:
From my perspective as an IT pro, Sun is selling BMW's at $200k. It's
a great car, but a Mercedes is half the cost. Most hardware consumers
have already flocked to the competition, which explains Sun's
staggering losses and the Oracle buyout. We can't aff
Tom Hall wrote:
Re the DDT, can someone outline it's structure please? Some sort of
hash table? The blogs I have read so far dont specify.
It is stored in a ZAP object, which is an extensible hash table. See
zap.[ch], ddt_zap.c, ddt.h
--matt
___
z
On Tue, Feb 9, 2010 at 2:39 PM, Toby Thain wrote:
>
> On 9-Feb-10, at 2:02 PM, Frank Cusack wrote:
>
> On 2/9/10 12:03 PM +1100 Daniel Carosone wrote:>
>>
>>> Snorcle wants to sell hardware.
>>>
>>
>> LOL ... snorcle
>>
>> But apparently they don't. Have you seen the new website? Seems like a
On Feb 8, 2010, at 20:03, Daniel Carosone wrote:
Snorcle wants to sell hardware.
Larry Ellison wants Oracle to be a "systems" company, a la T. J.
Watson Jr.'s IBM and Cisco:
"We are not going into the hardware business. We have no interest in
the hardware business. We have a deep interes
On Tue, Feb 9, 2010 at 1:38 PM, Erik Trimble wrote:
> Bottom line here: if someone comes along and provides the same level of
> service for a better price, the market will flock to them. Or if the market
> decides the current level of service is unnecessary, it will move to vendors
> providing t
matthew patton wrote:
It might help people to understand how ridiculous they
sound going on and on
about buying a premium storage appliance without any
storage.
Since I started this, let me explain to those who can't begin to understand why I proposed
something so "stupid". At work (branc
Oooops, some snapshots were using all the missing space.
While I played around with some commands I've read in the ZFS Administration
Guide and the ZFS FAQ, I stumbled over 6 or 7 snapshots of my opensolaris-7 be.
I wonder where they come from, because I've never worked with snapshots so far
an
Am 08.02.2010 um 20:03 schrieb Richard Elling:
> Are you sure there is not another fault here? What does "svcs -xv" show?
Well, I don't have the result of svcs -xv, since the fault is recovered by now,
but it turned out not to be a hardware failure but an unstable USB-conectivity.
But sill: Wh
On Tue, Feb 09, 2010 at 08:26:42AM -0800, Richard Elling wrote:
> >> "zdb -D poolname" will provide details on the DDT size. FWIW, I have a
> >> pool with 52M DDT entries and the DDT is around 26GB.
I wish -D was documented; I had forgotten about it and only found the
(expensive) -S variant, whic
On 9-Feb-10, at 2:02 PM, Frank Cusack wrote:
On 2/9/10 12:03 PM +1100 Daniel Carosone wrote:>
Snorcle wants to sell hardware.
LOL ... snorcle
But apparently they don't. Have you seen the new website? Seems
like a
blatant attempt to kill the hardware business to me.
That's very sad.
Greeting ALL
I am wondering if it is possible to monitor the ZFS ARC cache hits using
DTRACE. In orher words, would be possible to know how many ARC cache hits
have been resulted by a particular application such as firefox ??
Your response is highly appreciated.
Thanks
--
Abdullah
dahl...@ie
On 2/9/10 12:03 PM +1100 Daniel Carosone wrote:>
Snorcle wants to sell hardware.
LOL ... snorcle
But apparently they don't. Have you seen the new website? Seems like a
blatant attempt to kill the hardware business to me.
___
zfs-discuss mailing li
> It might help people to understand how ridiculous they
> sound going on and on
> about buying a premium storage appliance without any
> storage.
Since I started this, let me explain to those who can't begin to understand why
I proposed something so "stupid". At work (branch of a federal gov't b
On 02/09/10 08:18, Kjetil Torgrim Homme wrote:
Richard Elling writes:
On Feb 8, 2010, at 9:10 PM, Damon Atkins wrote:
I would have thought that if I write 1k then ZFS txg times out in
30secs, then the 1k will be written to disk in a 1k record block, and
then if I write 4k then 30secs latte
On Feb 9, 2010, at 7:24 AM, Kjetil Torgrim Homme wrote:
> Richard Elling writes:
>
>> On Feb 8, 2010, at 6:04 PM, Kjetil Torgrim Homme wrote:
>>> the size of [a DDT] entry is much larger:
>>>
>>> | From: Mertol Ozyoney
>>> |
>>> | Approximately it's 150 bytes per individual block.
>>
>> "zdb
Richard Elling writes:
> On Feb 8, 2010, at 6:04 PM, Kjetil Torgrim Homme wrote:
>> the size of [a DDT] entry is much larger:
>>
>> | From: Mertol Ozyoney
>> |
>> | Approximately it's 150 bytes per individual block.
>
> "zdb -D poolname" will provide details on the DDT size. FWIW, I have a
>
Richard Elling writes:
> On Feb 8, 2010, at 9:10 PM, Damon Atkins wrote:
>
>> I would have thought that if I write 1k then ZFS txg times out in
>> 30secs, then the 1k will be written to disk in a 1k record block, and
>> then if I write 4k then 30secs latter txg happen another 4k record
>> size bl
Just an observation: panic occurs in avl_add when called from
find_ds_by_guid that tries to add existing snapshot id to the avl tree
(http://src.opensolaris.org/source/xref/onnv/onnv-gate/usr/src/uts/common/fs/zfs/dmu_send.c#find_ds_by_guid).
HTH,
Andrey
On Tue, Feb 9, 2010 at 1:37 AM, Bruno D
On Feb 8, 2010, at 4:58 PM, Edward Ned Harvey > wrote:
How are you managing UID's on the NFS server? If user eharvey
connects to
server from client Mac A, or Mac B, or Windows 1, or Windows 2, or
any of
the linux machines ... the server has to know it's eharvey, and
assign the
correct UID'
Short answer : yes.
You'll find more info regarding COMSTAR (the iscsi target in
opensolaris) here http://hub.opensolaris.org/bin/view/Project+comstar/
For the windows part : http://etherboot.org/wiki/sanboot and here
http://etherboot.org/wiki/sanboot/iscsi_install
-- arnaud
Le 08/02/2010 22
On 02/ 8/10 06:38 PM, Lori Alt wrote:
Can you please send a complete list of the actions taken: The
commands you used to create the send stream, the commands used to
receive the stream. Also the output of `zfs list -t all` on both the
sending and receiving sides. If you were able to collec
> There's also questions of case sensitivity, locking, being mounted at
> boot time rather than login time, accomodating more than one user.
> I've also heard SMB is far slower.
>
> The Macs I've switched to automounted NFS are causing me less trouble.
>
> If you are in a ``share almost everythin
Am 09.02.10 02:30, schrieb Bob Friesenhahn:
On Tue, 9 Feb 2010, Felix Buenemann wrote:
Well to make things short: Using JBOD + ZFS Striped Mirrors vs.
controller's RAID10, dropped the max. sequential read I/O from over
400 MByte/s to below 300 MByte/s. However random I/O and sequential
writes s
34 matches
Mail list logo
