On 23/03/10 01:23 PM, Bart Nabbe wrote:
All,
I did some digging and I was under the impression that the
mr_sas driver was to support the LSISAS2004 HBA controller
from LSI.
I did add the pci id to the driver alias for mr_sas, but
then the driver still showed up as unattached (see below).
On Mon, Mar 22, 2010 at 10:58:05PM -0700, homerun wrote:
if i access to datapool from network , smb , nfs , ftp , sftp , jne...
i get only max 200 KB/s speeds
compared to rpool that give XX MB/S speeds to and from network it is slow.
Any ideas what reasons might be and how try to find
Heh.
The original definition of I was inexpensive. Was never meant to be
independent.
Guess that changed by vendors. The idea all along was to take inexpensive
hardware
and use software to turn it into a reliable system.
http://portal.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=50214
Hi
Well what is changed in system.
replaced 4 sata disks with new and bigger disks.
same time recreated raidz to raidz2
updated OS from b132 to 134
It used to work with old setup.
Has there been some driver changes.
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
Sorry to beat the dead horse, but I've just found perhaps the only
written proof that OpenSolaris is supportable. For those of you who
deny that this is an issue, its existence as a supported OS has been
recently erased from every other place I've seen on the Oracle sites.
Everyone please grab a
On Tue, Mar 23, 2010 at 7:11 AM, Jacob Ritorto jacob.rito...@gmail.comwrote:
Sorry to beat the dead horse, but I've just found perhaps the only
written proof that OpenSolaris is supportable. For those of you who
deny that this is an issue, its existence as a supported OS has been
recently
Wow, they actually did the right thing in the end. This is fantastic.
I'm all too happy to eat as much crow as you have to offer. I wonder
when (if?) they'll bring back the ability to purchase OpenSolaris
subscriptions online..
I'm actually so happy right now that I even appreciate Tim's
what does prstat show?
We had a lot of trouble here using iscsi and zvols due to the cpu capping out
with speeds less than 20mb/sec.
After simply switching to Qlogic fibre HBAs and a file backed lu we went to
160mb/sec on that same test platform.
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
Not quite brave enough to put dedup into prodiction here.
Concerned about the issues some folks have had when releasing large numbers of
blocks in one go.
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
Is there any action required to make ZFS properly align itself when using
advanced format drives such as the newer WD Green drives? I prefer to use them
by dedicating the whole disk to zfs, rather than using slices, although I would
assume if I used a slice I could manually align it.
Thanks
Kind of a newbie question here -- or I haven't been able to find great
search terms for this...
Does ZFS recognize zpool members based on drive serial number or some
other unique, drive-associated ID? Or is it based off the drive's
location (c0t0d0, etc).
I'm wondering because I have a zpool
Greetings all,
I recently applied all patches and upgraded my zpool to version 15
and zfs to version 4 so I could start using the zfs userquota
feature. What I've found though is that I can only apply them on new
datasets, not on the existing datasets. Here is an example:
# zfs list
NAME
On Tue, Mar 23, 2010 at 2:00 PM, Ray Van Dolson rvandol...@esri.com wrote:
Kind of a newbie question here -- or I haven't been able to find great
search terms for this...
Does ZFS recognize zpool members based on drive serial number or some
other unique, drive-associated ID? Or is it based
On Tue, March 23, 2010 12:00, Ray Van Dolson wrote:
Kind of a newbie question here -- or I haven't been able to find great
search terms for this...
Does ZFS recognize zpool members based on drive serial number or some
other unique, drive-associated ID? Or is it based off the drive's
Hi
Here is more specs.
MB:
K8N4-E SE
- AMD Socket 754 CPU
- NVIDIA® nForce™ 4 4X
- PCI Express Architecture
- Gigabit LAN
- 4 SATA RAID Ports
- 10 USB2.0 Ports
http://www.asus.com/product.aspx?P_ID=TBx7PakpparxrK89templete=2
Now situation is this :
with ftp :
i can upload to datapool with
http://www.bitshop.com/Blogs/tabid/95/EntryId/78/Bug-in-OpenSolaris-SMB-Server-causes-slow-disk-i-o-always.aspx
This explains just how major of a bug this issue is IMHO - The SMB slowdown
from Windows 2003 is doing something odd in the Kernel I think now from the
symptoms - See the tests for
Matt Cowger mcow...@salesforce.com writes:
zfs list | grep '@'
zpool/f...@1154758324G - 461G -
zpool/f...@1208482 6.94G - 338G -
zpool/f...@daily.netbackup 1.07G - 344G -
zpool/f...@1154758
+--
| On 2010-03-23 16:09:05, Harry Putnam wrote:
|
| Date: Tue, 23 Mar 2010 16:09:05 -0500
| From: Harry Putnam rea...@newsguy.com
| To: zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
| Subject: Re: [zfs-discuss] snapshots as versioning
I'm running s10u8, not opensolaris, so I could be a bit behind.
--M
-Original Message-
From: zfs-discuss-boun...@opensolaris.org
[mailto:zfs-discuss-boun...@opensolaris.org] On Behalf Of Bryan Allen
Sent: Tuesday, March 23, 2010 2:14 PM
To: Harry Putnam
Cc: zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
On 03/22/10 11:50 PM, Richard Elling wrote:
Look again, the checksums are different.
Whoops, you are correct, as usual. Just 6 bits out of 256 different...
Last year
expected 4a027c11b3ba4cec bf274565d5615b7b 3ef5fe61b2ed672e ec8692f7fd33094a
actual 4a027c11b3ba4cec bf274567d5615b7b
On Tue, Mar 23, 2010 at 11:09 PM, Harry Putnam rea...@newsguy.com wrote:
Matt Cowger mcow...@salesforce.com writes:
zfs list | grep '@'
zpool/f...@1154758 324G - 461G -
zpool/f...@1208482 6.94G - 338G -
21 matches
Mail list logo
