Re: [zfs-discuss] "Invisible" snapshot/clone

2011-03-17 Thread Peter Jeremy
On 2011-Mar-17 10:23:01 +0800, Edward Ned Harvey wrote: >To find it, run zdb -d, and search for something with a % >Something like: zdb -d tank | grep % > >And then you can zfs destroy the thing. Thanks, that worked. > P.S. Every time I did this, the >zfs destroy would complete with some sor

Re: [zfs-discuss] dual protocal on one file system?

2011-03-17 Thread Carson Gaspar
On 3/17/2011 8:11 AM, David Magda wrote: From: Paul Kraus [mailto:p...@kraus-haus.org] [...] 2. Unix / Solaris limitation of 16 / 32 group membership #2 is fixed in OpenSolaris as of snv_129: http://bugs.opensolaris.org/bugdatabase/view_bug.do?bug_id=4088757 The new limit is 1024--the

Re: [zfs-discuss] FW: Solaris panic

2011-03-17 Thread Mike Gerdts
On Thu, Mar 17, 2011 at 10:46 AM, Karl Wagner wrote: > Hi all > > I have only just seen this, and thought someone may be able to help. > > On heavy IO activity, my Solaris 11 Express box hosting a ZFS data pool > crashes. It seems to show page faults in several things, including nfsd, > sched, zpo

Re: [zfs-discuss] FW: Solaris panic

2011-03-17 Thread Ian Collins
On 03/18/11 04:46 AM, Karl Wagner wrote: Hi all I have only just seen this, and thought someone may be able to help. On heavy IO activity, my Solaris 11 Express box hosting a ZFS data pool crashes. It seems to show page faults in several things, including nfsd, sched, zpool-tank and automountd

[zfs-discuss] FW: Solaris panic

2011-03-17 Thread Karl Wagner
Hi all I have only just seen this, and thought someone may be able to help. On heavy IO activity, my Solaris 11 Express box hosting a ZFS data pool crashes. It seems to show page faults in several things, including nfsd, sched, zpool-tank and automountd. I get the following in the logs: Mar 17

Re: [zfs-discuss] dual protocal on one file system?

2011-03-17 Thread David Magda
On Thu, March 17, 2011 09:53, Edward Ned Harvey wrote: >> From: Paul Kraus [mailto:p...@kraus-haus.org] [...] >> 2. Unix / Solaris limitation of 16 / 32 group membership >> 3. ACL management (must be done on the Solaris side) and visibility >> 4. performance (especially with many small files) >> >>

Re: [zfs-discuss] dual protocal on one file system?

2011-03-17 Thread Edward Ned Harvey
> From: Paul Kraus [mailto:p...@kraus-haus.org] > > > Samba even has modules for mapping NT RIDs to Nix UIDs/GIDs as well as a > module that > > supports "Previous Versions" using the hosts native snapshot method. > > But... if SAMBA has native AD authentication, and the underlying > OS can a

Re: [zfs-discuss] "Invisible" snapshot/clone

2011-03-17 Thread Edward Ned Harvey
> From: Freddie Cash [mailto:fjwc...@gmail.com] > > On Wed, Mar 16, 2011 at 7:23 PM, Edward Ned Harvey > wrote: > > P.S. If your primary goal is to use ZFS, you would probably be better > > switching to nexenta or openindiana or solaris 11 express, because they all > > support ZFS much better th

Re: [zfs-discuss] dual protocal on one file system?

2011-03-17 Thread Paul Kraus
On Wed, Mar 16, 2011 at 9:48 AM, Ross Walker wrote: > Samba has all those features as well. It has native support for different > platform ACLs > (Linux/Solaris/BSD) and supports mapping POSIX perms with platform ACLs to > present > a quasi NT ACL that reflects the native permissions of the hos