On 09/14/12 22:39, Edward Ned Harvey
(opensolarisisdeadlongliveopensolaris) wrote:
From: zfs-discuss-boun...@opensolaris.org [mailto:zfs-discuss-
boun...@opensolaris.org] On Behalf Of Dave Pooser
Unfortunately I did not realize that zvols require disk space sufficient
to duplicate the zvol, and
On 09/15/12 04:46 PM, Dave Pooser wrote:
I need a bit of a sanity check here.
1) I have a a RAIDZ2 of 8 1TB drives, so 6TB usable, running on an ancient
version of OpenSolaris (snv_134 I think). On that zpool (miniraid) I have
a zvol (RichRAID) that's using almost the whole FS. It's shared out v
> From: zfs-discuss-boun...@opensolaris.org [mailto:zfs-discuss-
> boun...@opensolaris.org] On Behalf Of Dave Pooser
>
> Unfortunately I did not realize that zvols require disk space sufficient
> to duplicate the zvol, and my zpool wasn't big enough. After a false start
> (zpool add is dangerous w
I need a bit of a sanity check here.
1) I have a a RAIDZ2 of 8 1TB drives, so 6TB usable, running on an ancient
version of OpenSolaris (snv_134 I think). On that zpool (miniraid) I have
a zvol (RichRAID) that's using almost the whole FS. It's shared out via
COMSTAR Fibre Channel target mode. I'd l
Interesting, They are in and running and I'm hitting on them pretty good.
One thing I did change: I've seen recommendations (one in particular from
nexenta) that recommends an 8KB recordsize for virtualization workloads
(which is 100% of my workload). I Svmotion'ed all the VMs off the datastore
Gremlins in my machine have deleted most of the pool metadata and I
need to know if it is possible to recover.
Setup is 8 disks in an external enclosure configured as raidz2
attached to a macpro running openindiana under vmware fusion.
This has worked fine for a number of months with the only cave
