[zfs-discuss] No ZFS snapshot since upgrade to 2009.06

2009-07-23 Thread Axelle Apvrille
I've upgrade my OpenSolaris 2008.11 to 2009.06. During that process it created a new boot environment: BEActive Mountpoint Space Policy Created ---- -- - -- --- opensolaris NR / 7.53G static 2009-01-03 13:18

[zfs-discuss] [SOLVED] Re: No ZFS snapshot since upgrade to 2009.06

2009-07-23 Thread Axelle Apvrille
Ok, I've found the solution to my problem on Internet here: http://sigtar.com/2009/03/17/troubleshooting-time-slider-zfs-snapshots/ This was indeed caused by the old boot environment. This is how to solve it: - disable snapshots on the old boot environment: pfexec zfs set

[zfs-discuss] Soon out of space (after upgrade to 2009.06)

2009-07-24 Thread Axelle Apvrille
Hi, I have upgraded from to 2008.11 to 2009.06. The upgrade process created a new boot environment (named opensolaris-1 in my case), but I am now getting out of space in my ZFS pool. So, can I safely erase the old boot environment, and if so will that get me back the disk space I need ? BE

Re: [zfs-discuss] Soon out of space (after upgrade to 2009.06)

2009-07-24 Thread Axelle Apvrille
Ok -- thanks for your reply. I just wonder what's in those 7 G, if a 3G pool is enough... ? Why has it grown so much ? I think I do not understand exactly the relationship between BE and the ZFS pools: if I destroy the BE, that doesn't destroy the data, does it ? it puts back the content of

[zfs-discuss] Beginner's question on output of zfs list

2009-07-25 Thread Axelle Apvrille
Hi, I'm pretty sure this is a beginner's question. The output of my zfs list is shown below. I don't understand how two ZFS file systems (opensolaris and opensolaris-1) can be mounted on the same mountpoint. [Hint: they correspond to different BEs]. And as I probably should erase one of them

[zfs-discuss] How to check what's on a given ZFS file system ?

2009-07-27 Thread Axelle Apvrille
Hi, I've already sent a few posts around this issue, but haven't quite got the answer - so I'll try to clarify my question :) Since I have upgraded from 2008.11 to 2009.06 a new BE has been created. On ZFS, that corresponds to two file systems, both (strangely) mounted on /. The old BE

Re: [zfs-discuss] How to check what's on a given ZFS file system ?

2009-07-27 Thread Axelle Apvrille
Thanks - that answers my question ! :)) -- This message posted from opensolaris.org ___ zfs-discuss mailing list zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss

Re: [zfs-discuss] Error: value too large for defined data type

2010-02-18 Thread Axelle Apvrille
Incidentally, I just wanted to let you know that solved my problem :) I can now parse my samba mounts which were complaining about value too large. Changed to the standard ls. Yet, this does not completely solve my problem, because file parsers do not manage to list files of my mount, even if I

[zfs-discuss] Adding a higher level partition to ZFS pool

2010-04-21 Thread Axelle Apvrille
Hi all, I would like to add a new partition to my ZFS pool but it looks like it's more stricky than expected. The layout of my disk is the following: - first partition for Windows. I want to keep it. (no formatting !) - second partition for OpenSolaris.This is where I have all the Solaris slices

Re: [zfs-discuss] Adding a higher level partition to ZFS pool

2010-09-24 Thread Axelle Apvrille
Up :) I still haven't found the way to do that. Is it impossible because this partition is outside my Solaris slices? Isn't there a way to use the space however ? Regards Axelle. -- This message posted from opensolaris.org ___ zfs-discuss mailing

Re: [zfs-discuss] Adding a higher level partition to ZFS pool

2010-09-24 Thread Axelle Apvrille
ok - it makes sense. Thanks ! Axelle. -- This message posted from opensolaris.org ___ zfs-discuss mailing list zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss