Hi,
I'm using b48 on two machines.. when I issued the following I get a
panic on the recv'ing machine:
$ zfs send -i data/[EMAIL PROTECTED] data/[EMAIL PROTECTED] | ssh machine2
zfs recv -F data
doing the following caused no problems:
zfs send -i data/[EMAIL PROTECTED] data/[EMAIL PROTECTED] |
. I'm looking into it...
Great, thanks!
thanks for testing!
Heh.. I'm not testing - I'm USING :)
-Mark
Noel
On Sep 26, 2006, at 6:21 AM, Mark Phalan wrote:
Hi,
I'm using b48 on two machines.. when I issued the following I get a
panic on the recv'ing machine:
$ zfs send -i data
On 21 Apr 2007, at 04:42, Rich Brown wrote:
Hi,
so far, discussing filesystem code via opensolaris
means a certain
specialization, in the sense that we do have:
zfs-discuss
ufs-discuss
fuse-discuss
Likewise, there are ZFS, NFS and UFS communities
(though I can't quite
figure out if we have
On Mon, 2007-11-05 at 02:16 -0800, Thomas Lecomte wrote:
Hello there -
I'm still waiting for an answer from Phillip Lougher [the SquashFS developer].
I had already contacted him some month ago, without any answer though.
I'll still write a proposal, and probably start the work soon too.
On Mon, 2007-11-05 at 10:27 +, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, 5 Nov 2007, Mark Phalan wrote:
On Mon, 2007-11-05 at 02:16 -0800, Thomas Lecomte wrote:
Hello there -
I'm still waiting for an answer from Phillip Lougher [the SquashFS
developer].
I had already contacted him
On Thu, 2007-11-15 at 17:20 +, Darren J Moffat wrote:
hex.cookie wrote:
In production environment, which platform should we use? Solaris 10 U4 or
OpenSolaris 70+? How should we estimate a stable edition for production?
Or OpenSolaris is stable in some build?
All depends on what
On Thu, 2007-11-15 at 07:22 -0800, Nabeel Saad wrote:
Hello,
I have a question about using ZFS with Fuse. A little bit of background of
what we've been doing first... We recently had an issue with a Solaris
server where the permissions of the main system files in /etc and such were
On Thu, 2008-07-10 at 11:42 +0100, Darren J Moffat wrote:
I regularly create new zfs filesystems or snapshots and I find it
annoying that I have to type the full dataset name in all of those cases.
I propose we allow zfs(1) to infer the part of the dataset name upto the
current working
On Thu, 2008-07-10 at 07:12 -0400, Mark J Musante wrote:
On Thu, 10 Jul 2008, Mark Phalan wrote:
I find this annoying as well. Another way that would help (but is fairly
orthogonal to your suggestion) would be to write a completion module for
zsh/bash/whatever that could tab-complete
On 28 Jun 2009, at 11:22, Daniel J. Priem wrote:
snip
Snapshots are significantly faster as well. My average transfer speed
went from about 15MB/sec to over 40MB/sec. I imagine that 40MB/sec is
now a limitation of the CPU, as I can see SSH maxing out a single
core
on the quad cores.
Maybe
10 matches
Mail list logo
