*push*
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
how is the performance on the zfs directly without nfs?
i have experienced big problems running nfs on large volumes (independent on
the underlaying fs)
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
i have a big testing pool attached to my system running solaris 10 8/07 (u4)
sparc.
there is only one zfs on the pool (testdata).
i did a big copy job to the device to fill it up completely.
somehow there is a big difference of 2% on the usage of the pool. can one
explain this ... ?
root / #
