Forwarding here, as suggested by chaps on storage-discuss.
Just to clarify, I was running filebench directly on the x4500, not from
an initiator, so this is probably not a COMSTAR thing.
Ceri
--
That must be wonderful! I don't understand it at all.
On Thu, Apr 05, 2007 at 09:58:47PM -0700, Rich Teer wrote:
I'm happy to inform that the ZFS file system is now part of the FreeBSD
operating system. ZFS is available in the HEAD branch and will be
available in FreeBSD 7.0-RELEASE as an experimental feature.
This is fantastic news! At the
On Tue, Jan 23, 2007 at 03:57:48PM +0530, Zoram Thanga wrote:
Hi Ceri,
I just saw your mail today. I'm replying In case you haven't found a
solution.
This is
6475304 zfs core dumps when trying to create new spool using did device
The workaround suggests:
Set environmental
On Tue, Jan 23, 2007 at 12:07:34PM +0100, Robert Milkowski wrote:
Hello Zoram,
Tuesday, January 23, 2007, 11:27:48 AM, you wrote:
ZT Hi Ceri,
ZT I just saw your mail today. I'm replying In case you haven't found a
ZT solution.
ZT This is
ZT 6475304 zfs core dumps when trying to
On an up to date Solaris 10 11/06 with Sun Cluster 3.2 and iSCSI backed
did devices, zpool dumps core on creation if I try to use a did device.
Using the underlying device works, and this might not be supported
(though I don't know), but I thought you would probably prefer to see
the error than
On Thu, Jan 18, 2007 at 06:55:39PM +0800, Jeremy Teo wrote:
On the issue of the ability to remove a device from a zpool, how
useful/pressing is this feature? Or is this more along the line of
nice to have?
We definitely need it. As a usage case, on occasion we have had to move
SAN sites, and
On Tue, Nov 28, 2006 at 04:48:19PM +, Dick Davies wrote:
Just spotted one - is this intentional?
You can't delegate a dataset to a zone if mountpoint=legacy.
Changing it to 'none' works fine.
vera / # zfs create tank/delegated
vera / # zfs get mountpoint tank/delegated
NAME
On Tue, Nov 28, 2006 at 06:08:23PM +0100, Terence Patrick Donoghue wrote:
Dick Davies wrote On 11/28/06 17:15,:
Is there a difference between setting mountpoint=legacy and
mountpoint=none?
Is there a difference - Yep,
'legacy' tells ZFS to refer to the /etc/vfstab file for FS mounts and
On Wed, Nov 15, 2006 at 04:45:02PM -0700, Lori Alt wrote:
Ceri Davies wrote:
On Tue, Nov 14, 2006 at 07:32:08PM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Actually, we have considered this. On both SPARC and x86, there will be
a way to specify the root file system (i.e., the bootable dataset
On Wed, Nov 15, 2006 at 04:23:18PM -0600, Nicolas Williams wrote:
On Wed, Nov 15, 2006 at 09:58:35PM +, Ceri Davies wrote:
On Wed, Nov 15, 2006 at 12:10:30PM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I think we first need to define what state up actually is. Is it the
kernel booted
On Tue, Nov 14, 2006 at 07:32:08PM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Actually, we have considered this. On both SPARC and x86, there will be
a way to specify the root file system (i.e., the bootable dataset) to be
booted,
at either the GRUB prompt (for x86) or the OBP prompt (for SPARC).
If
On Wed, Nov 01, 2006 at 04:00:43PM -0500, Torrey McMahon wrote:
Spencer Shepler wrote:
On Wed, Adam Leventhal wrote:
On Wed, Nov 01, 2006 at 01:17:02PM -0500, Torrey McMahon wrote:
Is there going to be a method to override that on the import? I can see
a situation where you want to
On Wed, Nov 01, 2006 at 02:14:24AM -0800, Adam Leventhal wrote:
On Wed, Nov 01, 2006 at 10:05:01AM +, Ceri Davies wrote:
On Wed, Nov 01, 2006 at 01:33:33AM -0800, Adam Leventhal wrote:
Rick McNeal and I have been working on building support for sharing ZVOLs
as iSCSI targets directly
On Wed, Nov 01, 2006 at 10:57:27AM -0800, Adam Leventhal wrote:
On Wed, Nov 01, 2006 at 01:17:02PM -0500, Torrey McMahon wrote:
Is there going to be a method to override that on the import? I can see
a situation where you want to import the pool for some kind of
maintenance procedure but
On Sun, Oct 29, 2006 at 12:01:45PM -0800, Richard Elling - PAE wrote:
Chris Adams wrote:
We're looking at replacing a current Linux server with a T1000 + a fiber
channel enclosure to take advantage of ZFS. Unfortunately, the T1000 only
has a single drive bay (!) which makes it impossible to
On Wed, Oct 11, 2006 at 06:36:28PM -0500, David Dyer-Bennet wrote:
On 10/11/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The more I learn about Solaris hardware support, the more I see it as
a minefield.
I've found this to be true for almost all open source platforms where
you're
On Wed, Oct 11, 2006 at 11:49:48PM -0700, Matthew Ahrens wrote:
James McPherson wrote:
On 10/12/06, Steve Goldberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Where is the ZFS configuration (zpools, mountpoints, filesystems,
etc) data stored within Solaris? Is there something akin to vfstab
or perhaps a
On Thu, Oct 12, 2006 at 02:06:15PM +0100, Dick Davies wrote:
On 12/10/06, Ceri Davies [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, Oct 11, 2006 at 11:49:48PM -0700, Matthew Ahrens wrote:
FYI, /etc/zfs/zpool.cache just tells us what pools to open when you boot
up. Everything else (mountpoints
On Thu, Oct 12, 2006 at 07:53:37AM -0600, Mark Maybee wrote:
Ceri Davies wrote:
On Wed, Oct 11, 2006 at 11:49:48PM -0700, Matthew Ahrens wrote:
James McPherson wrote:
On 10/12/06, Steve Goldberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Where is the ZFS configuration (zpools, mountpoints, filesystems
On Thu, Oct 12, 2006 at 02:54:05PM +0100, Ceri Davies wrote:
On Thu, Oct 12, 2006 at 02:06:15PM +0100, Dick Davies wrote:
On 12/10/06, Ceri Davies [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, Oct 11, 2006 at 11:49:48PM -0700, Matthew Ahrens wrote:
FYI, /etc/zfs/zpool.cache just tells us what pools
On Thu, Oct 05, 2006 at 11:04:49AM -0400, Zhisong Jin wrote:
would it possible to use ZFS snapshot as way
to doing hot backup for oracle database?
anybody have tried that?
You would need to put the tablespaces with data files on the filesystem
being snapped into backup mode while you take
On Thu, Sep 14, 2006 at 05:08:18PM -0500, Nicolas Williams wrote:
On Thu, Sep 14, 2006 at 10:32:59PM +0200, Henk Langeveld wrote:
Bady, Brant RBCM:EX wrote:
Part of the archiving process is to generate checksums (I happen to use
MD5), and store them with other metadata about the digital
On Wed, Sep 13, 2006 at 06:37:25PM +0100, Darren J Moffat wrote:
Dale Ghent wrote:
On Sep 13, 2006, at 12:32 PM, Eric Schrock wrote:
Storing the hostid as a last-ditch check for administrative error is a
reasonable RFE - just one that we haven't yet gotten around to.
Claiming that it will
Hi Matt,
Interesting proposal. Has there been any
consideration if free space being reported for a ZFS
filesystem would take into account the copies
setting?
Example:
zfs create mypool/nonredundant_data
zfs create mypool/redundant_data
df -h /mypool/nonredundant_data
24 matches
Mail list logo
