[zfs-discuss] Fwd: My blog post about installing ZFS on Debian GNU/Linux posted to the zfs-discuss mailing list

2012-05-06 Thread David E. Anderson
Done and done, to both lists
-- Forwarded message --
From: Aaron Toponce aaron.topo...@gmail.com
Date: May 6, 2012 7:48 AM
Subject: My blog post about installing ZFS on Debian GNU/Linux posted to
the zfs-discuss mailing list
To: David E. danders...@gmail.com

http://pthree.org/2012/04/17/install-zfs-on-debian-gnulinux/

I mentioned that the ZFS on Linux project supports encryption, but that was
a bit naive on my part. I was excited that I had it installed, and had
heard that ZFS supported encryption natively, but hadn't gotten around to
testing it when I published that post. Needless to say, I was disappointed
when learning that it wasn't implemented until version 30, and the ZFS on
Linux project only had version 28.

At any event, I've updated the post to reflect the correct standing of the
project. If you wouldn't mind forwarding this message to the list, seeing
as though I am not subscribed, that would be great. It would be nice to
clear my name, at least a little bit. :)

Also, Jim Klimov asks if GNU/Linux can boot off raidz roots. I'm not sure
if raidz, as I am using hardware RAID on my workstation, but a ZFS root is
bootable with GRUB, I have tested it, and it works fine, although it took a
bit of hacking to get it working correctly.

Thanks,

--
. o .   o . o   . . o   o . .   . o .
. . o   . o o   o . o   . o o   . . o
o o o   . o .   . o o   o o .   o o o


pgp8wOZSEBqs6.pgp
Description: PGP signature
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss


[zfs-discuss] Fwd: native ZFS on Linux

2011-02-18 Thread David E. Anderson
Here is part of what could be the answer:
https://launchpad.net/~dajhorn/+archive/zfs

A DKMS solution implemented using zfsonlinux.org and kqstor.com.  I don't
know how this is related to the Pinguy version, but suspect this is a
DKMS'ization
of what they did.  Will let you know when I find out...
-- 
David
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss


[zfs-discuss] Fwd: native ZFS on Linux

2011-02-13 Thread David E. Anderson
I found out from the distro maintainer that the kernel uses source from
zfsonlinux.org's git repository, but have not found someone who has
mounted a zfs filesystem, so I don't know the status of the port.
I wonder if the kqstor code was merged into this repository?


-- Forwarded message --
From: Malte Schirmacher malte.schirmac...@webfrap.de
Date: Sun, Feb 13, 2011 at 5:51 AM
Subject: Re: [zfs-discuss] native ZFS on Linux
To: zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org


On 12.02.2011 18:18, David E. Anderson wrote:
 I see that Pinguy OS, an uber-Ubuntu o/s, includes native ZFS support.
 Any pointers to more info on this?

Thre are currently three different ways, to get ZFS working on linux.

First the implementation by kqstore. They largly used the work from
behlendorf(zfsonlinx.org) and merely added the very thin posixlayer
which belendorf wasnt able/willing to implement yet.

The version by kqstor works so far, although its still very buggy and
sloow.

The version by behlendorf works except on its unable to mount
zfs-datasets  though its possble to use zvols.

Then we have a third try (which in fact was the first try to bring zfs
to linux) with zfs-fuse.net.
As the name indicates it makes use of FUSE (filesystem in userspace --
http://fuse.sourceforge.net/).

This third one i quite far ahead and the one which is already packaged
for ubuntu.

HTH
 Malte



___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss



-- 
David
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss


[zfs-discuss] native ZFS on Linux

2011-02-12 Thread David E. Anderson
I see that Pinguy OS, an uber-Ubuntu o/s, includes native ZFS support.
Any pointers to more info on this?

-- 
David
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss


[zfs-discuss] Fwd: native ZFS on Linux

2011-02-12 Thread David E. Anderson
went to IRC for the distro, will post when I have more info.  I think
this is kqstor-based


-- Forwarded message --
From: C. Bergström codest...@osunix.org
Date: 2011/2/12
Subject: Re: [zfs-discuss] native ZFS on Linux
To:
Cc: zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org


Ray Van Dolson wrote:

 On Sat, Feb 12, 2011 at 09:18:26AM -0800, David E. Anderson wrote:


 I see that Pinguy OS, an uber-Ubuntu o/s, includes native ZFS support.
 Any pointers to more info on this?


 Probably using this[1].


doubtful.. It's more likely based on
http://zfsonlinux.org/

Why not post to the distro mailing list or look at the source though?
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss



-- 
David
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss


Re: [zfs-discuss] most of my space is gone

2010-02-06 Thread David E. Anderson
how can I delete obsolete BEs if I have run out of space and have to boot
from LiveCD?

On Sat, Feb 6, 2010 at 9:33 AM, Bill Sommerfeld sommerf...@sun.com wrote:

 On 02/06/10 08:38, Frank Middleton wrote:

 AFAIK there is no way to get around this. You can set a flag so that pkg
 tries to empty /var/pkg/downloads, but even though it looks empty, it
 won't actually become empty until you delete the snapshots, and IIRC
 you still have to manually delete the contents. I understand that you
 can try creating a separate dataset and mounting it on /var/pkg, but I
 haven't tried it yet, and I have no idea if doing so gets around the
 BE snapshot problem.


 You can set the environment variable PKG_CACHEDIR to place the cache in an
 alternate filesystem.

 ___
 zfs-discuss mailing list
 zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
 http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss




-- 
David
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss


Re: [zfs-discuss] Raid-Z Issue

2009-09-11 Thread David E. Anderson
some time out if they don't have updated firmware

On Fri, Sep 11, 2009 at 11:57 AM, Volker A. Brandt v...@bb-c.de wrote:

  Seagate 1.5 TB drives?

 This sounds somewhat ominous.  Are there known problems?


 Thanks -- Volker
 --
 
 Volker A. Brandt  Consulting and Support for Sun Solaris
 Brandt  Brandt Computer GmbH   WWW: http://www.bb-c.de/
 Am Wiesenpfad 6, 53340 Meckenheim Email: v...@bb-c.de
 Handelsregister: Amtsgericht Bonn, HRB 10513  Schuhgröße: 45
 Geschäftsführer: Rainer J. H. Brandt und Volker A. Brandt
 ___
 zfs-discuss mailing list
 zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
 http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss




-- 
David
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss


[zfs-discuss] missing disk space

2009-08-03 Thread David E. Anderson
I am new to ZFS, so please bear with me...

I created a raidz1 pool from three 1.5TB disks on OpenSolaris 2009.6.  I see
less than 1TB useable space.  What did I do wrong?

$ zpool list
NAME  SIZE   USED  AVAILCAP  HEALTH  ALTROOT
rpool 464G  42.2G   422G 9%  ONLINE  -
storage  1.36T   143K  1.36T 0%  ONLINE  -

$ df -h /storage
FilesystemSize  Used Avail Use% Mounted on
storage   913G   26K  913G   1% /storage

$ zpool status
  pool: rpool
 state: ONLINE
 scrub: none requested
config:

NAME  STATE READ WRITE CKSUM
rpool ONLINE   0 0 0
  mirror  ONLINE   0 0 0
c8t1d0s0  ONLINE   0 0 0
c10d0s0   ONLINE   0 0 0

errors: No known data errors

  pool: storage
 state: ONLINE
 scrub: none requested
config:

NAME STATE READ WRITE CKSUM
storage  ONLINE   0 0 0
  raidz1 ONLINE   0 0 0
c9d0s2   ONLINE   0 0 0
c10d0s2  ONLINE   0 0 0
c10d1s2  ONLINE   0 0 0

errors: No known data errors

-- 
David
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss


Re: [zfs-discuss] missing disk space

2009-08-03 Thread David E. Anderson
$ zfs get all storage
NAME PROPERTY  VALUE  SOURCE
storage  type  filesystem -
storage  creation  Fri Jul 10 21:19 2009  -
storage  used  89.2K  -
storage  available 913G   -
storage  referenced25.3K  -
storage  compressratio 1.00x  -
storage  mounted   yes-
storage  quota none   default
storage  reservation   none   default
storage  recordsize128K   default
storage  mountpoint/storage   default
storage  sharenfs  offdefault
storage  checksum  on default
storage  compression   offdefault
storage  atime on default
storage  devices   on default
storage  exec  on default
storage  setuidon default
storage  readonly  offdefault
storage  zoned offdefault
storage  snapdir   hidden default
storage  aclmode   groupmask  default
storage  aclinheritrestricted default
storage  canmount  on default
storage  shareiscsioffdefault
storage  xattr on default
storage  copies1  default
storage  version   3  -
storage  utf8only  off-
storage  normalization none   -
storage  casesensitivity   sensitive  -
storage  vscan offdefault
storage  nbmandoffdefault
storage  sharesmb  offdefault
storage  refquota  none   default
storage  refreservationnone   default
storage  primarycache  alldefault
storage  secondarycachealldefault
storage  usedbysnapshots   0  -
storage  usedbydataset 25.3K  -
storage  usedbychildren63.9K  -
storage  usedbyrefreservation  0

On Mon, Aug 3, 2009 at 10:34 AM, Blake blake.ir...@gmail.com wrote:

 On Mon, Aug 3, 2009 at 12:35 PM, David E. Andersondanders...@gmail.com
 wrote:
  I am new to ZFS, so please bear with me...
 
  I created a raidz1 pool from three 1.5TB disks on OpenSolaris 2009.6.  I
 see
  less than 1TB useable space.  What did I do wrong?
 snip


 can you post the output of 'zfs get all storage' ?

 blake




-- 
David
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss


[zfs-discuss] Fwd: MISSING PILOT ( was: missing disk space)

2009-08-03 Thread David E. Anderson
Pilot Error fixed... thanks!

-- Forwarded message --
From: Blake blake.ir...@gmail.com
Date: Mon, Aug 3, 2009 at 10:53 AM
Subject: Re: [zfs-discuss] missing disk space
To: David E. Anderson danders...@gmail.com
Cc: zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org


On Mon, Aug 3, 2009 at 1:41 PM, David E. Andersondanders...@gmail.com
wrote:
 $ zfs get all storage
 NAME PROPERTY  VALUE  SOURCE
 storage  type  filesystem -
 storage  creation  Fri Jul 10 21:19 2009  -
 storage  used  89.2K  -
 storage  available 913G   -
 storage  referenced25.3K  -
 storage  compressratio 1.00x  -
 storage  mounted   yes-
 storage  quota none   default
 storage  reservation   none   default
 storage  recordsize128K   default
 storage  mountpoint/storage   default
 storage  sharenfs  offdefault
 storage  checksum  on default
 storage  compression   offdefault
 storage  atime on default
 storage  devices   on default
 storage  exec  on default
 storage  setuidon default
 storage  readonly  offdefault
 storage  zoned offdefault
 storage  snapdir   hidden default
 storage  aclmode   groupmask  default
 storage  aclinheritrestricted default
 storage  canmount  on default
 storage  shareiscsioffdefault
 storage  xattr on default
 storage  copies1  default
 storage  version   3  -
 storage  utf8only  off-
 storage  normalization none   -
 storage  casesensitivity   sensitive  -
 storage  vscan offdefault
 storage  nbmandoffdefault
 storage  sharesmb  offdefault
 storage  refquota  none   default
 storage  refreservationnone   default
 storage  primarycache  alldefault
 storage  secondarycachealldefault
 storage  usedbysnapshots   0  -
 storage  usedbydataset 25.3K  -
 storage  usedbychildren63.9K  -
 storage  usedbyrefreservation  0

 On Mon, Aug 3, 2009 at 10:34 AM, Blake blake.ir...@gmail.com wrote:

 On Mon, Aug 3, 2009 at 12:35 PM, David E. Andersondanders...@gmail.com
 wrote:
  I am new to ZFS, so please bear with me...
 
  I created a raidz1 pool from three 1.5TB disks on OpenSolaris 2009.6.
I
  see
  less than 1TB useable space.  What did I do wrong?
 snip


 can you post the output of 'zfs get all storage' ?

 blake



 --
 David


Looking back at your 'zpool status' output, I think you might have
accidentally made put one of your big storage disks in your rpool, and
one of your little rpool disks in your big storage pool.



-- 
David
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss