Does it matter if the /dev names of the partitions change (i.e. from /
dev/dsk/c2t2250CC611005d3s0 to another machine not using sun hba
drivers with a different/shorter name??)
thanks
keith
If the file does not exist than ZFS will not attempt to open any
pools at boot. You must
On Oct 1, 2006, at 11:24 PM, Anton B. Rang wrote:
I was perhaps slightly hasty; RAID-5 is more efficient than a 2-
disk mirror for reads, but RAID-10 (striping mirroring) can match
(or slightly exceed) its efficiency for small reads. In both cases,
there is a single disk accessed.
With
On Sep 29, 2006, at 2:41 AM, Roch wrote:
IMO, RAIDZn should perform admirably on the write loads.
The random reads aspects is more limited. The simple rule of
thumb is to consider that a RAIDZ group will deliver random
read IOPS with the performance characteristic of single
device. That
Folks,
I've heard that for small reads/writes (like a mailstore), mirroring
is preferred to raiding. Can some explain why or direct me to that
info? I assumed that raidzn would be the preferred method but
apparently not.
thanks,
keith
___
Folks,
We are in the process of purchasing new san/s that our mail server
runs on (JES3). We have moved our mailstores to zfs and continue to
have checksum errors -- they are corrected but this improves on the
ufs inode errors that require system shutdown and fsck.
So, I am recommending
