I am trying to keep a file system (actually quite a few) in sync across two
systems for DR purposes, but I am encountering something that I find strange.
Maybe its not strange, and I just don't understand - but I will pose to you
fine people to help answer my question. This is all scripted, but
Thanks ... the -F works perfectly, and provides a further benefit in that the
client can mess with the file system as much as they want for testing purposes,
but when it comes time to ensure it is synchronized each night, it will revert
back to the previous state.
Thanks
-Tony
--
This message
Greetings learned ZFS geeks guru’s,
Yet another question comes from my continued ZFS performance testing. This has
to do with zpool iostat, and the strangeness that I do see.
I’ve created an eight (8) disk raidz pool from a Sun 3510 fibre array giving me
a 465G volume.
# zpool create tp raidz
Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: April 16, 2007 2:16 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [zfs-discuss] Testing of UFS, VxFS and ZFS
Is the VxVM volume 8-wide? It is not clear from your creation commands.
-- richard
Tony Galway wrote:
I had previously
A question (well lets make it 3 really) – Is vdbench a useful tool when testing
file system performance of a ZFS file system? Secondly - is ZFS write
performance really much worse than UFS or VxFS? and Third - what is a good
benchmarking tool to test ZFS vs UFS vs VxFS?
The reason I ask is
