On Sat, Nov 10, 2012 at 5:00 PM, Tim Cook t...@cook.ms wrote:
On Sat, Nov 10, 2012 at 9:48 AM, Jan Owoc jso...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, Nov 10, 2012 at 8:14 AM, Trond Michelsen tron...@gmail.com
wrote:
How can I replace the drive without migrating all the data to a
different pool
, I should have built the new pool without the 2TB drives,
and had I known what I do now, I would definately have done that.
--
Trond Michelsen
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs
creating the pool, but I apparently did not check after
adding the old drives, because this is the first time I've noticed
that there's any ashift=9 in the pool.
--
Trond Michelsen
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http
the data to a
different pool? It is possible, I hope?
--
Trond Michelsen
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
On Tue, Jul 5, 2011 at 12:54 PM, Lanky Doodle lanky_doo...@hotmail.com wrote:
OK, I have finally settled on hardware;
2x LSI SAS3081E-R controllers
Beware that this controller does not support drives larger than 2TB.
--
Trond Michelsen
___
zfs
worse
if it were a raidz.
Is this one of those Advanced format drives (Western Digital EARS or
Samsung F4), which emulates 512 byte sectors? Or is that only a
problem with raidz anyway?
--
Trond Michelsen
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss
, they
should be at least become pretty well balanced at the end of the
process.
Are my assumptions correct? Are there any better/faster ways?
--
Trond Michelsen
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman
