Re: [zfs-discuss] Who is using ZFS ACL's in production?

2010-03-02 Thread ep
On 2 March 2010 08:13, Fredrich Maney fredrichma...@gmail.com wrote: I haven't been really closely following this discussion, but I might have a solution. A quick glance at 'man chmod(1)' will show that there is an unused bit in the file mask, namely '7000'. Isn't that just like having

Re: [zfs-discuss] Who is using ZFS ACL's in production?

2010-03-02 Thread ep
On 2 March 2010 10:35, Fredrich Maney fredrichma...@gmail.com wrote: Logically it would be setuid + setgid + sticky, but it is not defined in the man page and I don't have the ability to read through the applicable source code. If it's not available, then I retract my suggestion, and instead