Re: [zfs-discuss] 'legacy' vs 'none'

2006-11-29 Thread Dick Davies
On 28/11/06, Terence Patrick Donoghue [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Is there a difference - Yep, 'legacy' tells ZFS to refer to the /etc/vfstab file for FS mounts and options whereas 'none' tells ZFS not to mount the ZFS filesystem at all. Then you would need to manually mount the ZFS using 'zfs set

[zfs-discuss] 'legacy' vs 'none'

2006-11-28 Thread Dick Davies
Is there a difference between setting mountpoint=legacy and mountpoint=none? -- Rasputin :: Jack of All Trades - Master of Nuns http://number9.hellooperator.net/ ___ zfs-discuss mailing list zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org

Re: [zfs-discuss] 'legacy' vs 'none'

2006-11-28 Thread Terence Patrick Donoghue
Is there a difference - Yep, 'legacy' tells ZFS to refer to the /etc/vfstab file for FS mounts and options whereas 'none' tells ZFS not to mount the ZFS filesystem at all. Then you would need to manually mount the ZFS using 'zfs set mountpoint=/mountpoint poolname/fsname' to get it mounted.

Re: [zfs-discuss] 'legacy' vs 'none'

2006-11-28 Thread Ceri Davies
On Tue, Nov 28, 2006 at 06:08:23PM +0100, Terence Patrick Donoghue wrote: Dick Davies wrote On 11/28/06 17:15,: Is there a difference between setting mountpoint=legacy and mountpoint=none? Is there a difference - Yep, 'legacy' tells ZFS to refer to the /etc/vfstab file for FS mounts and

Re: [zfs-discuss] 'legacy' vs 'none'

2006-11-28 Thread Eric Schrock
On Tue, Nov 28, 2006 at 06:06:24PM +, Ceri Davies wrote: But you could presumably get that exact effect by not listing a filesystem in /etc/vfstab. Yes, but someone could still manually mount the filesystem using 'mount -F zfs ...'. If you set the mountpoint to 'none', then it cannot