On Wed, 10 Feb 2010, David Dyer-Bennet wrote:
My experience with ACLs is that they suck dead diseased rats through a
straw and I wish I could turn them off.
That seems overly harsh ;).
What I would dearly love is an option to disable all ACL suppport.
If you never explicitly use ACL's on
We have an open bug which results in new directories created over NFSv4
from a linux client having the wrong group ownership. While waiting for a
patch to resolve the issue, we have a script running hourly on the server
which finds directories owned by the wrong group and fixes them.
One of our
CC'ed to security-disc...@opensolaris.org
-- richard
On Feb 10, 2010, at 4:45 PM, Paul B. Henson wrote:
We have an open bug which results in new directories created over NFSv4
from a linux client having the wrong group ownership. While waiting for a
patch to resolve the issue, we have a
On Wed, Feb 10, 2010 at 6:45 PM, Paul B. Henson hen...@acm.org wrote:
We have an open bug which results in new directories created over NFSv4
from a linux client having the wrong group ownership. While waiting for a
patch to resolve the issue, we have a script running hourly on the server
On Wed, 10 Feb 2010, Jason King wrote:
I suspect that zfs is interpreting the group ACLs and adjusting the mode
value accordingly to try to indicate the 'preserve owner/group on new
file' semantics with the old permissions, however it sounds like it's not
a symmetric operation -- if chgrp
On 2/10/2010 9:36 PM, Jason King wrote:
rant type=mini
My experience (perhaps others will have different experiences) is that
due to the added complexity and administrative overhead, ACLs are used
when it's absolutely necessary -- i.e. you have something that due to
it's nature must have very
