Re: [zfs-discuss] Antwort: Re: Performance of ZFS and UFS inside local/global zone

[Casper . Dik]

I did that.

Isn't that sufficient proof?

Perhaps run both tests in the global zone?

Casper

___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss

[zfs-discuss] Antwort: Re: Performance of ZFS and UFS inside local/global zone

[André Bögelsack]

Hi Casper,

I did that.

1. I created a directory and mounted the device in the global zone - run 
filebench
umount device
2. I created a directory and mounted the device in the local zone - run 
filebench
-- No difference

It seems the loop-back-driver causes the performance degredation - but how 
can I prove this thesis?

andré



Von:
casper@sun.com
An:
Andre Boegelsack boege...@in.tum.de
Kopie:
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
Datum:
20.10.2009 15:23
Betreff:
Re: [zfs-discuss] Performance of ZFS and UFS inside local/global zone
Gesendet von:
cas...@holland.sun.com





Very easy:

 - make a directory
 - mount it using lofs

run filebench on both directories.

It seems like that we need to make lofs faster.

Casper


___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss