On 09/17/10 23:31, Ian Collins wrote:
On 09/18/10 04:46 PM, Neil Perrin wrote:
On 09/17/10 18:32, Edward Ned Harvey wrote:
From: Neil Perrin [mailto:neil.per...@oracle.com]
you lose information. Not your whole pool. You lose up to
30 sec of writes
The default is now 5
From: zfs-discuss-boun...@opensolaris.org [mailto:zfs-discuss-
boun...@opensolaris.org] On Behalf Of Bryan Horstmann-Allen
The ability to remove the slogs isn't really the win here, it's import
-F. The
Disagree.
Although I agree the -F is important and good, I think the log device
removal
On Sep 17, 2010, at 20:32, Edward Ned Harvey wrote:
When did that become default? Should I *ever* say 30 sec anymore?
June 8, 2010, revision 12586:b118bbd65be9:
http://src.opensolaris.org/source/history/onnv/onnv-gate/usr/src/uts/common/fs/zfs/txg.c
On 09/17/10 18:32, Edward Ned Harvey wrote:
From: Neil Perrin [mailto:neil.per...@oracle.com]
you lose information. Not your whole pool. You lose up to
30 sec of writes
The default is now 5 seconds (zfs_txg_timeout).
When did that become default?
It was changed more
On 09/18/10 04:46 PM, Neil Perrin wrote:
On 09/17/10 18:32, Edward Ned Harvey wrote:
From: Neil Perrin [mailto:neil.per...@oracle.com]
you lose information. Not your whole pool. You lose up to
30 sec of writes
The default is now 5 seconds (zfs_txg_timeout).
When did
Best practice in Solaris 10 U8 and older was to use a mirrored ZIL.
With the ability to remove slog devices in Solaris 10 U9, we're
thinking we may get more bang for our buck to use two slog devices for
improved IOPS performance instead of needing the redundancy so much.
Any thoughts on this?
+--
| On 2010-09-16 18:08:46, Ray Van Dolson wrote:
|
| Best practice in Solaris 10 U8 and older was to use a mirrored ZIL.
|
| With the ability to remove slog devices in Solaris 10 U9, we're
| thinking we may get more
