On 28 Nov 2008, at 00:07, Peter Brouwer, Principal Storage Architect
wrote:
dick hoogendijk wrote:
On Thu, 27 Nov 2008 12:58:20 +
Chris Ridd [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm not 100% convinced it'll boot if half the mirror's not there,
Believe me, it will (been there done that). You
On Wed, Nov 26, 2008 at 04:30:59PM +0100, C. Bergstr?m wrote:
Ok. here's a trick question.. So to the best of my understanding zfs
turns off write caching if it doesn't own the whole disk.. So what if s0
*is* the whole disk? Is write cache supposed to be turned on or off?
Actually, ZFS
On 26 Nov 2008, at 17:08, Chris Ridd wrote:
It feels a lot like don't start from here (ie from my 2008.05
install) so I'm doing an install of 101b from CD onto one of the new
disks right now. At least format's not showing a swap slice now,
yippee. I'll try and get it mirroring afterwards,
dick hoogendijk wrote:
On Thu, 27 Nov 2008 12:58:20 +
Chris Ridd [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm not 100% convinced it'll boot if half the mirror's not there,
Believe me, it will (been there done that). You -have- to make sure
though that both disks have installgrub
On 26 Nov 2008, at 13:12, dick hoogendijk wrote:
On Wed, 26 Nov 2008 12:51:04 +
Chris Ridd [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm replacing the disk with my rpool with a mirrored pool, and
wondering how best to do that.
The disk I'm replacing is partitioned with root on s0, swap on s1
and boot
On Wed, 26 Nov 2008 12:51:04 +
Chris Ridd [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm replacing the disk with my rpool with a mirrored pool, and
wondering how best to do that.
The disk I'm replacing is partitioned with root on s0, swap on s1
and boot on s8, which is what the original 2008.05
I'm replacing the disk with my rpool with a mirrored pool, and
wondering how best to do that.
The disk I'm replacing is partitioned with root on s0, swap on s1 and
boot on s8, which is what the original 2008.05 installer created for
me. I've partitioned the new disk in the same way and am
Chris Ridd wrote:
On 26 Nov 2008, at 13:12, dick hoogendijk wrote:
On Wed, 26 Nov 2008 12:51:04 +
Chris Ridd [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm replacing the disk with my rpool with a mirrored pool, and
wondering how best to do that.
The disk I'm replacing is partitioned with root
dick hoogendijk wrote:
On Wed, 26 Nov 2008 12:51:04 +
Chris Ridd [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm replacing the disk with my rpool with a mirrored pool, and
wondering how best to do that.
The disk I'm replacing is partitioned with root on s0, swap on s1
and boot on s8, which is what the
Hi,
maybe this [1] will help you. For more Information read also the linked
Blog [2].
HTH
[1] http://darkstar-solaris.blogspot.com/2008/09/zfs-root-mirror.html
[2] http://malsserver.blogspot.com/2008/08/mirroring-resolved-correct-way.html
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
On Wed, 26 Nov 2008 15:29:50 +0100
C. Bergström [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
To clear up some confusion..
This is from a default indiana install
format -e
verify..
Part TagFlag Cylinders SizeBlocks
0 rootwm 262 - 19453 147.02GB
On Wed, 26 Nov 2008 14:37:21 +
Darren J Moffat [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
dick hoogendijk wrote:
I've never seen a ZFS system on seperate slices. Slices are things
from the past ;-)
Unfortunately not the case for ZFS pools that are to be booted from.
This is because we can't boot
Darren J Moffat wrote:
dick hoogendijk wrote:
On Wed, 26 Nov 2008 12:51:04 +
Chris Ridd [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm replacing the disk with my rpool with a mirrored pool, and
wondering how best to do that.
The disk I'm replacing is partitioned with root on s0, swap on s1
dick hoogendijk wrote:
On Wed, 26 Nov 2008 15:29:50 +0100
C. Bergström [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
To clear up some confusion..
This is from a default indiana install
format -e
verify..
Part TagFlag Cylinders SizeBlocks
0 rootwm 262 -
On 26-Nov-08, at 10:30 AM, C. Bergström wrote:
... Also is it more efficient/better
performing to give swap a 2nd slice on the inner part of the disk
or not
care and just toss it on top of zfs?
I think the thing about swap is that if you're swapping, you probably
have more to worry
On 26 Nov 2008, at 14:37, Darren J Moffat wrote:
dick hoogendijk wrote:
On Wed, 26 Nov 2008 12:51:04 +
Chris Ridd [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
But what do I do with that swap slice? Should I ditch it and create
an rpool/swap area? Do I still need a boot slice?
Depending on where it is in
On Wed, Nov 26, 2008 at 04:30:59PM +0100, C. Bergstr?m wrote:
Ok. here's a trick question.. So to the best of my understanding zfs
turns off write caching if it doesn't own the whole disk.. So what if s0
*is* the whole disk? Is write cache supposed to be turned on or off?
Actually, ZFS
17 matches
Mail list logo
