Harry Putnam rea...@newsguy.com writes:
I'm seeing a really big (to big to be excused lightly) difference with
the 2 zfs native methods zpool and rpool
Typo alert: The above line should have read:
the 2 zfs native methods ZPOOL list and ZFS list
compared to 2 native unix
Will Murnane will.murn...@gmail.com writes:
In short, there are many commands because there are many answers, and
many questions. No single tool has all the information available to
it.
Thanks for such a complete answer... and nicely put too.
___
Will Murnane will.murn...@gmail.com writes:
It's important to consider what you want this data for. Considering
upgrading your storage to get more room? Check out zpool list.
Need to know whether accounting or engineering is using more space?
Look at zfs list. Looking at a sparse or
Hi Harry,
Both du and df are pre-ZFS commands and don't really understand ZFS
space issues, which are described in the ZFS FAQ here:
http://hub.opensolaris.org/bin/view/Community+Group+zfs/faq
Why does du(1) report different file sizes for ZFS and UFS? Why doesn't
the space consumption that is
On Sun, Apr 18, 2010 at 20:08, Harry Putnam rea...@newsguy.com wrote:
Seems like you can get some pretty large discrepancies in sizes of
pools. and directories.
They all answer different things, sure, but they're all things that an
administrator might want to know.
zpool list
How many bytes
