On Fri, Jan 25, 2008 at 12:59:18AM -0500, Kyle McDonald wrote:
... With the 256MB doing write caching, is there any further benefit
to moving thte ZIL to a flash or other fast NV storage?
Do some tests with/without ZIL enabled. You should see a big
difference. You should see something
Albert Chin wrote:
On Fri, Jan 25, 2008 at 12:59:18AM -0500, Kyle McDonald wrote:
... With the 256MB doing write caching, is there any further benefit
to moving thte ZIL to a flash or other fast NV storage?
Do some tests with/without ZIL enabled. You should see a big
difference.
Kyle McDonald wrote:
Albert Chin wrote:
On Tue, Jan 22, 2008 at 09:20:30PM -0500, Kyle McDonald wrote:
Anyone know the answer to this? I'll be ordering 2 of the 7K's for
my x346's this week. If niether A nor B will work I'm not sure
there's any advantage to using the 7k card
Erik Trimble wrote:
Kyle McDonald wrote:
Albert Chin wrote:
On Tue, Jan 22, 2008 at 09:20:30PM -0500, Kyle McDonald wrote:
Anyone know the answer to this? I'll be ordering 2 of the 7K's for
my x346's this week. If niether A nor B will work I'm not sure
there's any advantage to
Are there, or Does it make any sense to try to find a RAID card with
battery backup that will ignore the ZFS commit commands when the battery
is able to guarantee stable storage?
I don't know if they do this, but I've recently had good non-ZFS
performance with the IBM ServeRAID 8k raid that
Are there, or Does it make any sense to try to find a RAID card with
battery backup that will ignore the ZFS commit commands when the battery
is able to guarantee stable storage?
I don't know if they do this, but I've recently had good non-ZFS
performance with the IBM ServeRAID 8k raid that
On Tue, Jan 22, 2008 at 12:47:37PM -0500, Kyle McDonald wrote:
My primary use case, is NFS base storage to a farm of software build
servers, and developer desktops.
For the above environment, you'll probably see a noticable improvement
with a battery-backed NVRAM-based ZIL. Unfortunately, no
Albert Chin wrote:
On Tue, Jan 22, 2008 at 12:47:37PM -0500, Kyle McDonald wrote:
My primary use case, is NFS base storage to a farm of software build
servers, and developer desktops.
For the above environment, you'll probably see a noticable improvement
with a battery-backed
Carson Gaspar wrote:
Kyle McDonald wrote:
...
I know, but for a that card you need a driver to make it appear as a
device. Plus it would take a PCI slot.
I was hoping to make use of the battery backed ram on a RAID card that I
already have (but can't use since I want to let ZFS do the
Albert Chin wrote:
On Tue, Jan 22, 2008 at 09:20:30PM -0500, Kyle McDonald wrote:
Anyone know the answer to this? I'll be ordering 2 of the 7K's for
my x346's this week. If niether A nor B will work I'm not sure
there's any advantage to using the 7k card considering I want ZFS to
do the
10 matches
Mail list logo
