Re: [zfs-discuss] On-failure policies for pools

2007-01-24 Thread Richard Elling
comment below... Peter Schuller wrote: In many situations it may not feel worth it to move to a raidz2 just to avoid this particular case. I can't think of any, but then again, I get paid to worry about failures :-) Given that one of the tauted features of ZFS is data integrity, including in

[zfs-discuss] On-failure policies for pools

2007-01-23 Thread Peter Schuller
Hello, There have been comparisons posted here (and in general out there on the net) for various RAID levels and the chances of e.g. double failures. One problem that is rarely addressed though, is the various edge cases that significantly impact the probability of loss of data. In

Re: [zfs-discuss] On-failure policies for pools

2007-01-23 Thread Richard Elling
Peter Schuller wrote: Hello, There have been comparisons posted here (and in general out there on the net) for various RAID levels and the chances of e.g. double failures. One problem that is rarely addressed though, is the various edge cases that significantly impact the probability of loss