Re: [zfs-discuss] Please trim posts

2010-06-20 Thread James C. McPherson

On 19/06/10 07:58 AM, Marion Hakanson wrote:

doug.lin...@merchantlink.com said:

Apparently, before Outlook there WERE no meetings, because it's clearly
impossible to schedule one without it.


Don't tell my boss, but I use Outlook for the scheduling, and fetchmail
plus procmail to download email out of Exchange and into my favorite
email client.  Thankfully, Exchange listens to incoming SMTP when I need
to send messages.



And please don't mail me with your favorite OSS solution.  I've tried them
all.  None of them integrate with Exchange *smoothly* and *cleanly*.  They're
all workarounds and kludges that are as annoying in the end as Outlook.


Hmm, what I'm doing doesn't _integrate_ with Exchange;  It just bypasses
it for the email portion of my needs.  Non-OSS:  Mac OS X 10.6 claims to
integrate with Exchange, although I have not yet tried it myself.



Could we all please STOP RESPONDING to this thread?

It's not about ZFS at all.


James C. McPherson
--
Senior Software Engineer, Solaris
Oracle
http://www.jmcp.homeunix.com/blog
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss


Re: [zfs-discuss] Please trim posts

2010-06-18 Thread Marion Hakanson
doug.lin...@merchantlink.com said:
> Apparently, before Outlook there WERE no meetings, because it's clearly
> impossible to schedule one without it. 

Don't tell my boss, but I use Outlook for the scheduling, and fetchmail
plus procmail to download email out of Exchange and into my favorite
email client.  Thankfully, Exchange listens to incoming SMTP when I need
to send messages.


> And please don't mail me with your favorite OSS solution.  I've tried them
> all.  None of them integrate with Exchange *smoothly* and *cleanly*.  They're
> all workarounds and kludges that are as annoying in the end as Outlook. 

Hmm, what I'm doing doesn't _integrate_ with Exchange;  It just bypasses
it for the email portion of my needs.  Non-OSS:  Mac OS X 10.6 claims to
integrate with Exchange, although I have not yet tried it myself.

Regards,

Marion


___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss


Re: [zfs-discuss] Please trim posts

2010-06-18 Thread Linder, Doug
> People still use Outhouse?  Really?!  Next you'll be suggesting that
> some people still put up with Internet Exploder...  ;-)

Those of us who are literally forced to use it aren't too happy.  Nor am I 
happy with the giant stupid signature that gets tacked on that you all have to 
trim when you reply.  But I can't do anything about it.

The most infuriating thing is I could use Thunderbird or something actually 
good if it weren't for scheduling meetings.  Meeting scheduling.  It's the one 
killer feature that's been keeping Microsoft alive for decades.  When I say I 
want to use Thunderbird or something, the following conversation always 
happens, verbatim:

"Boss, I want to use Thunderbird."
"But... but.. how will you schedule meetings?"
"I never schedule meetings, you always do."
"But... but... how will you GET meetings?"
"Send me an email."
"But... but.. they won't show up on your Outlook Calendar!"
"I'm capable of adding them to my non-Outlook schedule manually."
"How will people see what times you're free?"
"They could just ask me 'When are you free?'"
"No.  We can't have you being a nonconformist.  You have to be able to send and 
accept meetings and have them put on your calendar.  You must use Outlook.  
Therefore we must use Exchange, forever and ever, world without end."


Apparently, before Outlook there WERE no meetings, because it's clearly 
impossible to schedule one without it.

And please don't mail me with your favorite OSS solution.  I've tried them all. 
 None of them integrate with Exchange *smoothly* and *cleanly*.  They're all 
workarounds and kludges that are as annoying in the end as Outlook.

> Agreed 100%.  I've even set up my mail server to reject HTML emails.

I have no problem with a little *basic* HTML.  I just wish I could limit it to 
a few simple tags - , , , etc - the most very basic formatting.  
No images.  No tables or any of that crap.  I do see how it's nice sometimes to 
be able to use a little emphasis.  It's nice to be able to add some personality 
with use a different font (if you don't go crazy with them).  But unfortunately 
it ends up getting horribly munged and misused.  Maybe there should be a filter 
that strips out all HTML except the basic tags.
--
Learn more about Merchant Link at www.merchantlink.com.

THIS MESSAGE IS CONFIDENTIAL.  This e-mail message and any attachments are 
proprietary and confidential information intended only for the use of the 
recipient(s) named above.  If you are not the intended recipient, you may not 
print, distribute, or copy this message or any attachments.  If you have 
received this communication in error, please notify the sender by return e-mail 
and delete this message and any attachments from your computer.

___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss


Re: [zfs-discuss] Please trim posts

2010-06-18 Thread Fredrich Maney
On Fri, Jun 18, 2010 at 3:52 PM, Linder, Doug
 wrote:
>> Another thing that Gmail does that I find infuriating, is that it
>> mucks with the formatting. For some reason it, and to be fair, Outlook
>> as well, seem to think that they know how a message needs to be
>> formatted better than I do.
>
> Try doing inline quoting/response with Outlook, where you quote one section, 
> reply, quote again, etc.  It's impossible.  You can't split up the quoted 
> section to add new text - no way, no how.  Very infuriating.  It's like 
> Outlook was *designed* to force people to top post.  It reminds me of the old 
> joke:
>
> "Because people read from top to bottom."
> "Why is top-posting stupid?"
>
> #include ms-rant.std
> --

Agreed. Outlook only becomes somewhat usable when you force it to
convert all email to plain-text and then it still screws with line
length and removes line breaks that it determines to be "extra".

On a side note, the person who dreamed up HTML and RTF email needs to
be drawn and quartered. If it can't be expressed clearly in
plain-text, then you should send it as an attachment.

fpsm
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss


Re: [zfs-discuss] Please trim posts

2010-06-18 Thread Geoff Nordli
>-Original Message-
>From: Linder, Doug
>Sent: Friday, June 18, 2010 12:53 PM
>
>Try doing inline quoting/response with Outlook, where you quote one
section,
>reply, quote again, etc.  It's impossible.  You can't split up the quoted
section to
>add new text - no way, no how.  Very infuriating.  It's like Outlook was
>*designed* to force people to top post.   
>
Hi Doug.

I use Outlook too, and you are right, it is a major PITA.  

I was hoping that OL2010 was going to solve the problem, but it doesn't :(

The only way I can get it to sort of work is by "editing" the HTML message,
and saving it as plain text, then replying to that.  If you try to reply to
an HTML formatted message, it is awful. 

I also manually clean up some of the header information below "Original
Message".  

Have a great weekend!

Geoff 


___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss


Re: [zfs-discuss] Please trim posts

2010-06-18 Thread Linder, Doug
> Another thing that Gmail does that I find infuriating, is that it
> mucks with the formatting. For some reason it, and to be fair, Outlook
> as well, seem to think that they know how a message needs to be
> formatted better than I do.

Try doing inline quoting/response with Outlook, where you quote one section, 
reply, quote again, etc.  It's impossible.  You can't split up the quoted 
section to add new text - no way, no how.  Very infuriating.  It's like Outlook 
was *designed* to force people to top post.  It reminds me of the old joke:

"Because people read from top to bottom."
"Why is top-posting stupid?"

#include ms-rant.std
--
Learn more about Merchant Link at www.merchantlink.com.

THIS MESSAGE IS CONFIDENTIAL.  This e-mail message and any attachments are 
proprietary and confidential information intended only for the use of the 
recipient(s) named above.  If you are not the intended recipient, you may not 
print, distribute, or copy this message or any attachments.  If you have 
received this communication in error, please notify the sender by return e-mail 
and delete this message and any attachments from your computer.

___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss


Re: [zfs-discuss] Please trim posts

2010-06-11 Thread Freddie Cash
On Fri, Jun 11, 2010 at 6:08 PM, Frank Cusack
wrote:

> This list is the worst one that I am on for that kind of behavior.  Makes
> me wonder how those folks can manage complex storage systems when they
> cannot even organize their thoughts efficiently.


As mentioned earlier, gmail may be behind a lot of this.  It's very good at
hiding quoted text from the person writing replies.  Many, many, many
screens of text can be hidden behind a single "show quoted text" link.
Making it appear as if there's only a tiny bit of text.  It even does it
when reading messages if there are more then 3 or 4 levels of quoting (all
but the top 2 or 3 are hidden).

For reading, it's great.  For writing, it's handy.  For others, it's not
such a great feature.  :)

Like everything, it's all about the tools.  Some people have tools that hide
a lot of the complexity that makes everything super simple and easy for them
... and a royal pain for everyone else (kinda like Windows).  :)

In the end, it all comes down to user education.
-- 
Freddie Cash
fjwc...@gmail.com
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss


Re: [zfs-discuss] Please trim posts

2010-06-11 Thread Frank Cusack

On 6/10/10 11:07 PM -0700 Dave Koelmeyer wrote:

I trimmed, and then got complained at by a mailing list user that the
context of what I was replying to was missing. Can't win :P


There's a big difference between trim and remove.

The worst is when people quote 3-4 paragraphs, respond inline to ONE of
the points, then leave the rest of a long email, signature and all,
quoted at the end.  ugh.

This list is the worst one that I am on for that kind of behavior.  Makes
me wonder how those folks can manage complex storage systems when they
cannot even organize their thoughts efficiently.
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss


Re: [zfs-discuss] Please trim posts

2010-06-11 Thread Ross Walker
On Jun 11, 2010, at 2:07 AM, Dave Koelmeyer   
wrote:


I trimmed, and then got complained at by a mailing list user that  
the context of what I was replying to was missing. Can't win :P


If at a minimum one trims the disclaimers, footers and signatures,  
that's better then nothing.


On long threads with inlined comments, think about keeping the  
previous 2 comments before or trimming anything 3 levels of indents or  
more.


Of course that's just my general rule of thumb and different  
discussions require different quotings, but just being mindful is  
often enough.


-Ross
 
___

zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss


Re: [zfs-discuss] Please trim posts

2010-06-11 Thread Fredrich Maney
On Fri, Jun 11, 2010 at 2:33 AM, Brandon High  wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 10, 2010 at 11:31 AM, Bob Friesenhahn
>  wrote:
>> I think that you may notice that most of the perpetrators are from Gmail.
>>  It seems that Gmail is very good at hiding existing text in its user
>> interface so people think nothing of including most/all of the email they
>> are replying to.
>
> Yeah, it's a major pet peeve of mine with gmail. Both work and
> freaks.com use Google Apps for mail, and I've caught myself failing to
> trim replies a few times.
>
> When you know everyone reading it has the same quoted text hiding,
> it's easy to get lazy.

Another thing that Gmail does that I find infuriating, is that it
mucks with the formatting. For some reason it, and to be fair, Outlook
as well, seem to think that they know how a message needs to be
formatted better than I do.

fpsm
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss


Re: [zfs-discuss] Please trim posts

2010-06-10 Thread Brandon High
On Thu, Jun 10, 2010 at 11:31 AM, Bob Friesenhahn
 wrote:
> I think that you may notice that most of the perpetrators are from Gmail.
>  It seems that Gmail is very good at hiding existing text in its user
> interface so people think nothing of including most/all of the email they
> are replying to.

Yeah, it's a major pet peeve of mine with gmail. Both work and
freaks.com use Google Apps for mail, and I've caught myself failing to
trim replies a few times.

When you know everyone reading it has the same quoted text hiding,
it's easy to get lazy.

-B

-- 
Brandon High : bh...@freaks.com
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss


Re: [zfs-discuss] Please trim posts

2010-06-10 Thread Dave Koelmeyer
I trimmed, and then got complained at by a mailing list user that the context 
of what I was replying to was missing. Can't win :P
-- 
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss


Re: [zfs-discuss] Please trim posts

2010-06-10 Thread Bob Friesenhahn

On Thu, 10 Jun 2010, Roy Sigurd Karlsbakk wrote:


The problem is all the top-posts and similar bottom-posts where 
everything in the thread is kept. This is not good netiquette, even 
in 2010.


I think that you may notice that most of the perpetrators are from 
Gmail.  It seems that Gmail is very good at hiding existing text in 
its user interface so people think nothing of including most/all of 
the email they are replying to.


Bob
--
Bob Friesenhahn
bfrie...@simple.dallas.tx.us, http://www.simplesystems.org/users/bfriesen/
GraphicsMagick Maintainer,http://www.GraphicsMagick.org/
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss


Re: [zfs-discuss] Please trim posts

2010-06-10 Thread Roy Sigurd Karlsbakk
> > It's getting downright ridiculous. The digest people will kiss you.
> 
> But those reading via individual message email quite possibly will
> not. Quoting at least what you're actually responding to is crucial to
> making sense out here.

The problem is all the top-posts and similar bottom-posts where everything in 
the thread is kept. This is not good netiquette, even in 2010.

Vennlige hilsener / Best regards

roy
--
Roy Sigurd Karlsbakk
(+47) 97542685
r...@karlsbakk.net
http://blogg.karlsbakk.net/
--
I all pedagogikk er det essensielt at pensum presenteres intelligibelt. Det er 
et elementært imperativ for alle pedagoger å unngå eksessiv anvendelse av 
idiomer med fremmed opprinnelse. I de fleste tilfeller eksisterer adekvate og 
relevante synonymer på norsk.
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss


Re: [zfs-discuss] Please trim posts

2010-06-10 Thread David Dyer-Bennet

On Thu, June 10, 2010 12:26, patto...@yahoo.com wrote:
> It's getting downright ridiculous. The digest people will kiss you.

But those reading via individual message email quite possibly will not. 
Quoting at least what you're actually responding to is crucial to making
sense out here.
-- 
David Dyer-Bennet, d...@dd-b.net; http://dd-b.net/
Snapshots: http://dd-b.net/dd-b/SnapshotAlbum/data/
Photos: http://dd-b.net/photography/gallery/
Dragaera: http://dragaera.info

___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss


[zfs-discuss] Please trim posts

2010-06-10 Thread pattonme
It's getting downright ridiculous. The digest people will kiss you. 
Sent via BlackBerry from T-Mobile

___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss