On Feb 12, 2007, at 8:05 AM, Robert Petkus wrote:
Some comments from the author:
1. It was a preliminary scratch report not meant to be exhaustive
and complete by any means. A comprehensive report of our findings
will be released soon.
2. I claim responsibility for any benchmarks gathere
Some comments from the author:
1. It was a preliminary scratch report not meant to be exhaustive and
complete by any means. A comprehensive report of our findings will be
released soon.
2. I claim responsibility for any benchmarks gathered from Thumper and
the Linux/FASST/ZFS configuration.
The Thumper was an eval unit on loan. Unfortunately time ran out so
we are unable to do additional tests. (It's now sitting in a crate
waiting to
be picked by the shipping company.)
Shigeki Misawa
Luke Lonergan wrote:
Has someone e-mailed the author to recommend upgrading to S10U3? I'm
shock
Has someone e-mailed the author to recommend upgrading to S10U3? I'm
shocked the eval was favorable with S10U2 given S10U3's substantial
performance improvements...
- Luke
> > Rayson Ho wrote:
> >
> >> Interesting...
> >>
> >>
> http://www.rhic.bnl.gov/RCF/LiaisonMeeting/20070118/Other/thumper
Ian Collins wrote:
Rayson Ho wrote:
Interesting...
http://www.rhic.bnl.gov/RCF/LiaisonMeeting/20070118/Other/thumper-eval.pdf
I wonder where they got the information that "Solaris 10 doesn't support
dual-core Intel" from?
probably from evaluating Solaris 8 or something.
__
To squash this before it gets out of hand, there was some confusion
about the configuration of the server used in the test. I had
mistakenly told the tester that the system was a dual CPU dual core
system (i.e., a total of 4 cores). It was not until quite
some time later (after the tests were run
Chris Ridd wrote:
On 11/2/07 3:04, "Ian Collins" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Rayson Ho wrote:
Interesting...
http://www.rhic.bnl.gov/RCF/LiaisonMeeting/20070118/Other/thumper-eval.pdf
I wonder where they got the information that "Solaris 10 doesn't support
dual-core Intel" from?
Does Ope
>On 11/2/07 3:04, "Ian Collins" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> Rayson Ho wrote:
>>
>>> Interesting...
>>>
>>> http://www.rhic.bnl.gov/RCF/LiaisonMeeting/20070118/Other/thumper-eval.pdf
>>>
>>>
>> I wonder where they got the information that "Solaris 10 doesn't support
>> dual-core Intel" from
On 11/2/07 3:04, "Ian Collins" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Rayson Ho wrote:
>
>> Interesting...
>>
>> http://www.rhic.bnl.gov/RCF/LiaisonMeeting/20070118/Other/thumper-eval.pdf
>>
>>
> I wonder where they got the information that "Solaris 10 doesn't support
> dual-core Intel" from?
Does Open
Rayson Ho wrote:
> Interesting...
>
> http://www.rhic.bnl.gov/RCF/LiaisonMeeting/20070118/Other/thumper-eval.pdf
>
>
I wonder where they got the information that "Solaris 10 doesn't support
dual-core Intel" from?
Ian.
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-d
Interesting...
http://www.rhic.bnl.gov/RCF/LiaisonMeeting/20070118/Other/thumper-eval.pdf
http://scalability.org/?p=202
Rayson
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
11 matches
Mail list logo
