Re: [zfs-discuss] Re: No zfs_nocacheflush in Solaris 10?

2007-05-27 Thread Robert Milkowski
Hello Grant, Friday, May 25, 2007, 6:54:04 PM, you wrote: It would also be worthwhile doing something like the following to determine the max throughput the H/W RAID is giving you: # time dd of=raw disk if=/dev/zero bs=1048576 count=1000 or a 2Gbps 6140 with 300GB/10K drives, we get

[zfs-discuss] Re: No zfs_nocacheflush in Solaris 10?

2007-05-25 Thread Grant Kelly
It would also be worthwhile doing something like the following to determine the max throughput the H/W RAID is giving you: # time dd of=raw disk if=/dev/zero bs=1048576 count=1000 or a 2Gbps 6140 with 300GB/10K drives, we get ~46MB/s on a single-drive RAID-0 array, ~83MB/s on a 4-disk

Re: [zfs-discuss] Re: No zfs_nocacheflush in Solaris 10?

2007-05-25 Thread Albert Chin
On Fri, May 25, 2007 at 09:54:04AM -0700, Grant Kelly wrote: It would also be worthwhile doing something like the following to determine the max throughput the H/W RAID is giving you: # time dd of=raw disk if=/dev/zero bs=1048576 count=1000 or a 2Gbps 6140 with 300GB/10K drives, we get

Re: [zfs-discuss] Re: No zfs_nocacheflush in Solaris 10?

2007-05-25 Thread Matthew Ahrens
Albert Chin wrote: I don't think you want to if=/dev/zero on ZFS. There's probably some optimization going on. Better to use /dev/urandom or concat n-many files comprised of random bits. Unless you have turned on compression, that is not the case. By default there is no optimization for all