> On Mon, Apr 23, 2007 at 09:38:47AM -0700, Gino wrote: > > > > we had 5 corrupted zpool (on different servers and > different SANs) ! > > With Solaris up to S10U3 and Nevada up to snv59 we > are able to corrupt > > easily a zpool only disconnecting a few times one > or more luns of a > > zpool under high i/o load. > > > > We are testing now snv60. > > As I've mentioned before, I believe you were tripping > over the space map > bug (6458218) which was fixed in build 60 and will > appear in S10u4. Let > us know if you are able to reproduce the problem on > build 60 or later.
Eric, we done our first test with snv60. we moved over 40TB of data between 4 zpools and in the mean time we've done about 100000 snapshots and forced 50 panic disabling ports on the fc switches. None of the pools have been corrupted! Also we found snv60 MUCH more stable than S10U3. gino This message posted from opensolaris.org _______________________________________________ zfs-discuss mailing list zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
